Literature DB >> 27875263

Reversible developmental stasis in response to nutrient availability in the Xenopus laevis central nervous system.

C R McKeown1, C K Thompson2, H T Cline2.   

Abstract

Many organisms confront intermittent nutrient restriction (NR), but the mechanisms to cope with nutrient fluctuations during development are not well understood. This is particularly true of the brain, the development and function of which is energy intensive. Here we examine the effects of nutrient availability on visual system development in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. During the first week of development, tadpoles draw nutrients from maternally provided yolk. Upon yolk depletion, animals forage for food. By altering access to external nutrients after yolk depletion, we identified a period of reversible stasis during tadpole development. We demonstrate that NR results in developmental stasis characterized by a decrease in overall growth of the animals, a failure to progress through developmental stages, and a decrease in volume of the optic tectum. During NR, neural progenitors virtually cease proliferation, but tadpoles swim and behave normally. Introducing food after temporary NR increased neural progenitor cell proliferation more than 10-fold relative to NR tadpoles, and cell proliferation was comparable to that of fed counterparts 1 week after delayed feeding. Delayed feeding also rescued NR-induced body length and tectal volume deficits and partially rescued developmental progression defects. Tadpoles recover from developmental stasis if food is provided within the first 9 days of NR, after which access to food fails to increase cell proliferation. These results show that early stages of tadpole brain development are acutely sensitive to fluctuations in nutrient availability and that NR induces developmental stasis from which animals can recover if food becomes available within a critical window.
© 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Development; Nutrition; Optic tectum; Stasis; Xenopus

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27875263      PMCID: PMC5312736          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.151043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  60 in total

Review 1.  How does calorie restriction work?

Authors:  Jana Koubova; Leonard Guarente
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  On the origin of cancer cells.

Authors:  O WARBURG
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Toward a unified theory of caloric restriction and longevity regulation.

Authors:  David A Sinclair
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 4.  To grow or not to grow: nutritional control of development during Caenorhabditis elegans L1 arrest.

Authors:  L Ryan Baugh
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Visual activity regulates neural progenitor cells in developing xenopus CNS through musashi1.

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Hollis T Cline
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  AMP-activated protein kinase induces a p53-dependent metabolic checkpoint.

Authors:  Russell G Jones; David R Plas; Sara Kubek; Monica Buzzai; James Mu; Yang Xu; Morris J Birnbaum; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Reversible whole-organism cell cycle arrest in a living vertebrate.

Authors:  Oltea Sampetrean; Shin-ichi Iida; Shinji Makino; Yuriko Matsuzaki; Kikuo Ohno; Hideyuki Saya
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  The zebrafish embryo as a dynamic model of anoxia tolerance.

Authors:  Bryce A Mendelsohn; Bethany L Kassebaum; Jonathan D Gitlin
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.780

9.  Insulin receptor signaling regulates synapse number, dendritic plasticity, and circuit function in vivo.

Authors:  Shu-Ling Chiu; Chih-Ming Chen; Hollis T Cline
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Regulation of lifespan in Drosophila by modulation of genes in the TOR signaling pathway.

Authors:  Pankaj Kapahi; Brian M Zid; Tony Harper; Daniel Koslover; Viveca Sapin; Seymour Benzer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  4 in total

1.  Nutrient restriction causes reversible G2 arrest in Xenopus neural progenitors.

Authors:  Caroline R McKeown; Hollis T Cline
Journal:  Development       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Nutrient availability contributes to a graded refractory period for regeneration in Xenopus tropicalis.

Authors:  Madison C Williams; Jeet H Patel; Anneke D Kakebeen; Andrea E Wills
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  An Innate Color Preference Displayed by Xenopus Tadpoles Is Persistent and Requires the Tegmentum.

Authors:  Jasper Elan Hunt; John Rudolph Bruno; Kara Geo Pratt
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 4.  Phenotypic Switching Resulting From Developmental Plasticity: Fixed or Reversible?

Authors:  Warren W Burggren
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.