Literature DB >> 27874321

The blocking effect in associative learning involves learned biases in rapid attentional capture.

David Luque1,2, Miguel A Vadillo3,4, María J Gutiérrez-Cobo2, Mike E Le Pelley1.   

Abstract

Blocking refers to the finding that less is learned about the relationship between a stimulus and an outcome if pairings are conducted in the presence of a second stimulus that has previously been established as a reliable predictor of that outcome. Attentional models of associative learning suggest that blocking reflects a reduction in the attention paid to the blocked cue. We tested this idea in three experiments in which participants were trained in an associative learning task using a blocking procedure. Attention to stimuli was measured 250 ms after onset using an adapted version of the dot probe task. This task was presented at the beginning of each learning trial (Experiments 1 and 2) or in independent trials (Experiment 3). Results show evidence of reduced attention to blocked stimuli (i.e. "attentional blocking"). In addition, this attentional bias correlated with the magnitude of blocking in associative learning, as measured by predictive-value judgments. Moreover, Experiments 2 and 3 found evidence of an influence of learning about predictiveness on memory for episodes involving stimuli. These findings are consistent with a central role of learned attentional biases in producing the blocking effect, and in the encoding of new memories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Associative learning; attention; blocking; dot probe; memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27874321     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1262435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  4 in total

1.  Testing the deductive inferential account of blocking in causal learning.

Authors:  Evan J Livesey; Justine K Greenaway; Samantha Schubert; Anna Thorwart
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

2.  The Three Models of Emotional Intelligence and Performance in a Hot and Cool go/no-go Task in Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  María J Gutiérrez-Cobo; Rosario Cabello; Pablo Fernández-Berrocal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.558

3.  Learned predictiveness acquired through experience prevails over the influence of conflicting verbal instructions in rapid selective attention.

Authors:  Pedro L Cobos; Miguel A Vadillo; David Luque; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Can We Set Aside Previous Experience in a Familiar Causal Scenario?

Authors:  Justine K Greenaway; Evan J Livesey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.