Literature DB >> 27874192

Comparing Methods to Assess Intraobserver Measurement Error of 3D Craniofacial Landmarks Using Geometric Morphometrics Through a Digitizer Arm.

Lumila Paula Menéndez1.   

Abstract

Intraobserver error (INTRA-OE) is the difference between repeated measurements of the same variable made by the same observer. The objective of this work was to evaluate INTRA-OE from 3D landmarks registered with a Microscribe, in different datasets: (A) the 3D coordinates, (B) linear measurements calculated from A, and (C) the six-first principal component axes. INTRA-OE was analyzed by digitizing 42 landmarks from 23 skulls in three events two weeks apart from each other. Systematic error was tested through repeated measures ANOVA (ANOVA-RM), while random error through intraclass correlation coefficient. Results showed that the largest differences between the three observations were found in the first dataset. Some anatomical points like nasion, ectoconchion, temporosphenoparietal, asterion, and temporomandibular presented the highest INTRA-OE. In the second dataset, local distances had higher INTRA-OE than global distances while the third dataset showed the lowest INTRA-OE.
© 2016 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

Keywords:  craniofacial morphometry; forensic science; geometric morphometrics; intraclass correlation coefficient; intraobserver error; repeated measures ANOVA

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27874192     DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  5 in total

1.  Three-dimensional surface scanning methods in osteology: A topographical and geometric morphometric comparison.

Authors:  Lukas Waltenberger; Katharina Rebay-Salisbury; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Multi-isotopic and morphometric evidence for the migration of farmers leading up to the Inka conquest of the southern Andes.

Authors:  Ramiro Barberena; Lumila Menéndez; Petrus J le Roux; Erik J Marsh; Augusto Tessone; Paula Novellino; Gustavo Lucero; Julie Luyt; Judith Sealy; Marcelo Cardillo; Alejandra Gasco; Carina Llano; Cecilia Frigolé; Daniela Guevara; Gabriela Da Peña; Diego Winocur; Anahí Benítez; Luis Cornejo; Fernanda Falabella; César Méndez; Amalia Nuevo-Delaunay; Lorena Sanhueza; Francisca Santana Sagredo; Andrés Troncoso; Sol Zárate; Víctor A Durán; Valeria Cortegoso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Testing inter-observer error under a collaborative research framework for studying lithic shape variability.

Authors:  Lucy Timbrell; Christopher Scott; Behailu Habte; Yosef Tefera; Hélène Monod; Mouna Qazzih; Benjamin Marais; Wendy Black; Christine Maroma; Emmanuel Ndiema; Struan Henderson; Katherine Elmes; Kimberly Plomp; Matt Grove
Journal:  Archaeol Anthropol Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.213

4.  Stereotactic topography of the greater and third occipital nerves and its clinical implication.

Authors:  Hong-San Kim; Kang-Jae Shin; Jehoon O; Hyun-Jin Kwon; Minho Lee; Hun-Mu Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Sources of variation in the 3dMDface and Vectra H1 3D facial imaging systems.

Authors:  Julie D White; Alejandra Ortega-Castrillon; Ciara Virgo; Karlijne Indencleef; Hanne Hoskens; Mark D Shriver; Peter Claes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.