| Literature DB >> 27874076 |
Clement Chan1, Colin M Hyslop1, Vipul Shrivastava1, Andrea Ochoa1, Raylene A Reimer1,2, Carol Huang1,3.
Abstract
In type 1 diabetes, restoration of normoglycemia can be achieved if the autoimmune attack on beta cells ceases and insulin requirement is met by the residual beta cells. We hypothesize that an adjunctive therapy that reduces insulin demand by increasing insulin sensitivity will improve the efficacy of an immunotherapy in reversing diabetes. We tested the gut microbiota-modulating prebiotic, oligofructose (OFS), as the adjunctive therapy. We treated non-obese diabetic mice with an immunotherapy, monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody (aCD3), with or without concurrent dietary supplement of OFS. After 8 weeks of OFS supplement, the group that received both aCD3 and OFS (aCD3 + OFS) had a higher diabetes remission rate than the group that received aCD3 alone. The aCD3 + OFS group had higher insulin sensitivity accompanied by reduced lymphocytic infiltrate into the pancreatic islets, higher beta-cell proliferation rate, higher pancreatic insulin content, and secreted more insulin in response to glucose. The addition of OFS also caused a change in gut microbiota, with a higher level of Bifidobacterium and lower Clostridium leptum. Hence, our results suggest that OFS can potentially be an effective therapeutic adjunct in the treatment of type 1 diabetes by improving insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function, leading to improved glycemic control.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27874076 PMCID: PMC5118692 DOI: 10.1038/srep37627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Effect of 8-week OFS supplement on diabetes remission, glucose homeostasis, and fecal microbiota in diabetic NOD mice.
| αCD3 | αCD3 + OFS | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| % of normoglycemic mice | 27% | 75% | |
| # of normoglycemic/total # of treated mice | 4/15 | 9/12 | χ:2 p = 0.02 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 6.84 ± 0.22 | 5.05 ± 0.42 | 0.004 |
| Fasting insulin (ng/ml) | 0.88 ± 0.29 | 0.39 ± 0.06 | 0.04 |
| HOMA-IR (mmol/L)*(ng/ml) | 6.16 ± 2.18 | 2.52 ± 0.31 | 0.03 |
| Total Bacteria# | 7198 ± 1056 | 7610 ± 1108 | 0.80 |
| Bacteroides/Prevotella | 906 ± 208 | 1327 ± 346 | 0.36 |
| Bifidobacterium spp. | 41.0 ± 18.4 | 236 ± 93.9 | 0.04* |
| Enterobacteriacea | 3.34 ± 0.28 | 3.17 ± 0.55 | 0.82 |
| Lactobacillus spp. | 440 ± 173 | 299 ± 74.5 | 0.43 |
| Clostridium coccoides (Cluster XIV) | 2819 ± 216 | 3341 ± 284 | 0.19 |
| Clostridium leptum (Cluster IV) | 297 ± 46.9 | 141 ± 27.3 | 0.006* |
| Clostridium group (Cluster I) | 0.06 ± 0.06 | 0.15 ± 0.11 | 0.55 |
| Clostridium group (Cluster XI) | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.65 |
| Roseburia hominis | 0.06 ± 0.06 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 0.86 |
| Methanobrevibacter smithii | 1.25 ± 0.19 | 1.30 ± 0.31 | 0.90 |
| Akkermansia muciniphila | 3.55 ± 1.39 | 127 ± 90.0 | 0.26 |
Comparisons are made between the aCD3 and aCD3 + OFS group by Student’s T tests for all of the above parameters, except for the proportion of mice that achieved diabetes remission, where Fisher’s exact test was performed.
Data for fecal microbiota are presented as 16 S rRNA gene copies (10*3)/20 ng total genomic DNA. All values are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 6 for αCD3 and n = 9 for αCD3 + OFS group.
Figure 1Diabetic NOD mice were treated with aCD3 (5 days) ± OFS (8 weeks).
Mice that responded to the treatment and achieved normoglycemia were assessed at the end of the 8-week treatment for insulin sensitivity (A), which was measured by a drop in blood glucose in response to intraperitoneal injection of insulin. Glucose tolerance (B) was measured by IPGTT. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 4–6 mice/treatment group. *p < 0.05 when comparing the aCD3 to the aCD3 + OFS group at the same time point.
Figure 2Mice that responded to the treatment and achieved normoglycemia at the end of 8-week treatment were assessed for (A) insulin secretion (measured as integrated area under the curve during the IPGTT). Insulin content (B) was then assessed in pancreas harvested after 8 weeks of treatment. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 4–6 mice/treatment group. *p < 0.05 when comparing the aCD3 to the aCD3 + OFS group at the same time point.
Figure 3(A) Beta-cell proliferation, (B) beta-cell fraction, and (C) beta-cell mass were compared between the aCD3 and the aCD3 + OFS group at the en d of the 8-week treatment. (D) Representative images of the islet, immunostained for insulin (red) and BrdU (green). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 4–6 mice/treatment group. *p < 0.05 when comparing the aCD3 to the aCD3 + OFS group.
Figure 4(A) Insulitis score, (B) percentage of insulitis-free islets, and (C) total insulitis score were compared between the aCD3 and the aCD3 + OFS group at the end of the 8-week treatment. (n = 4–6 mice/treatment group, at least 20 islets were counted from each mouse). (D) Percentage of Foxp3-positive cells in the pancreatic islets and pancreatic lymph nodes. Representative images of pancreatic lymph nodes, immunostained for Foxp3 (red) are shown. (n = 2–3 mice/treatment group, at least 3500 cells were counted for each group).