| Literature DB >> 27873999 |
Projjwal Banerjee1, Yong-Zhong Qian1, Alexander Heger2,3, W C Haxton4.
Abstract
About 4.6 billion years ago, some event disturbed a cloud of gas and dust, triggering the gravitational collapse that led to the formation of the solar system. A core-collapse supernova, whose shock wave is capable of compressing such a cloud, is an obvious candidate for the initiating event. This hypothesis can be tested because supernovae also produce telltale patterns of short-lived radionuclides, which would be preserved today as isotopic anomalies. Previous studies of the forensic evidence have been inconclusive, finding a pattern of isotopes differing from that produced in conventional supernova models. Here we argue that these difficulties either do not arise or are mitigated if the initiating supernova was a special type, low in mass and explosion energy. Key to our conclusion is the demonstration that short-lived 10Be can be readily synthesized in such supernovae by neutrino interactions, while anomalies in stable isotopes are suppressed.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27873999 PMCID: PMC5121422 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Nucleosynthetic yields as functions of the supernova progenitor's mass.
Selected yields of (a) stable isotopes and (b) short-lived radionuclides are shown, normalized to the 11.8-solar-mass model, for Case 1 with no fallback. The line segments connecting yields for specific progenitors are meant as a guide to the eye.
Yields of short-lived radionuclides from an 11.8-solar-mass core-collapse supernova.
| 10Be/9Be | 2.00 | 3.26(−10) | 1.40(−10) | (7.5±2.5)(−4) | 6.35(−4) | 6.35(−4) | 5.20(−4) |
| 26Al/27Al | 1.03 | 2.91(−6) | 5.65(−5) | (5.23±0.13)(−5) | 1.02(−5) | 9.90(−6) | 5.77(−6) |
| 36Cl/35Cl | 0.434 | 1.44(−7) | 3.50(−6) | ∼(3–20)(−6) | 2.00(−6) | 1.45(−6) | 6.15(−7) |
| 41Ca/40Ca | 0.147 | 3.66(−7) | 5.88(−5) | (4.1±2.0)(−9) | 3.40(−9) | 2.74(−9) | 2.26(−9) |
| 53Mn/55Mn | 5.40 | 1.22(−5) | 1.29(−5) | (6.28±0.66)(−6) | 4.04(−4) | 6.39(−6) | 6.16(−6) |
| 60Fe/56Fe | 3.78 | 3.08(−6) | 1.12(−3) | ∼1(−8);(5–10)(−7) | 9.80(−7) | 9.80(−7) | 1.10(−7) |
| 107Pd/108Pd | 9.38 | 1.37(−10) | 9.92(−10) | (5.9±2.2)(−5) | 6.27(−5) | 6.27(−5) | 5.72(−5) |
| 135Cs/133Cs | 3.32 | 2.56(−10) | 1.24(−9) | ∼5(−4) | 7.51(−5) | 7.51(−5) | 3.18(−5) |
| 182Hf/180Hf | 12.84 | 4.04(−11) | 2.52(−10) | (9.72±0.44)(−5) | 7.36(−5) | 7.36(−5) | 6.34(−6) |
| 8.84(−12) | 1.60(−5) | 1.60(−5) | 2.37(−6) | ||||
| 205Pb/204Pb | 24.96 | 9.20(−11) | 3.47(−10) | ∼1(−4);1(−3) | 1.27(−4) | 1.27(−4) | 7.78(−5) |
Comparisons are made to the corresponding isotopic ratios deduced from meteoritic data. Case 1 estimates are calculated from equation (1) using the approximate best-fit f and Δ of Fig. 2, assuming no fallback. The higher and lower yields for 182Hf are obtained from the laboratory and estimated stellar decay rates47 of 181Hf, respectively. Case 2 (3) is a fallback scenario in which only 1.5% of the innermost 1.02 × 10−2 solar mass (0.116 solar mass) of shocked material is ejected. With guidance from refs 22, 31, well-determined data are quoted with 2σ errors, while data with large uncertainties are preceded by ‘∼'. Note that x(−y) denotes x × 10−. Data references are: 10Be (refs 14, 16, 18, 19), 26Al (refs 2, 32), 36Cl (refs 33, 34, 35), 41Ca (refs 36, 37), 53Mn (ref. 38), 60Fe (refs 39, 40), 107Pd (ref. 41), 135Cs (ref. 42), 182Hf (ref. 43) and 205Pb (refs 44, 45).
Figure 2Relations between parameters characterizing the core-collapse supernova trigger.
The parameter f denotes the fraction of the yields of short-lived radionuclides incorporated into the proto-solar cloud, per solar mass. The parameter Δ denotes the time between the supernova explosion and incorporation of short-lived radionuclides into early solar system solids. Results are calculated from equation (1) using yields for the 11.8-solar-mass model with no fallback (Case 1) and meteoritic data for 10Be, 41Ca and 107Pd with 2σ uncertainties (Table 1). The filled circle at f∼5 × 10−4 and Δ∼1 Myr is the approximate best-fit point within the overlap region.