| Literature DB >> 27873770 |
Dagmara Jacewicz1, Michał Szkatuła2, Agnieszka Chylewska3, Aleksandra Dąbrowska4, Michał Woźniak5, Lech Chmurzyński6.
Abstract
In this paper instrumental methods ofEntities:
Keywords: carbon dioxide; hydrogen peroxide.; molecular biosensor; oxidative stress
Year: 2008 PMID: 27873770 PMCID: PMC3705456 DOI: 10.3390/s8084487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.(A) Structure of the synthesized coordination compound of Cr(III); (B) Tautomers of pyridoxamine.
Figure 2.Dependence rate constants (k1obs) from [H+] for the carbon dioxide uptake by the cis-[Cr(C2O4)(pm)(OH2)2]+ ion in the T=15°C.
Figure 3.Dependence rate constants (k2obs) from [H+] for the ring closure by the cis-[Cr(C2O4)(pm)(OH2)2]+ ion in the T=15°C.
Figure 4.The comparison of kinetic and spectral characteristics of reactants in simple inorganic CO2 generating system. (A) (I) Curves of concentration decay and buildup of the substrate A (which is the cis-[Cr(C2O4)(pm)(OH2)2]+ ion), product C as cis-[Cr(C2O4)(pm)(O2CO)]- ion, and intermediate product B. (II) Absorption spectra of the reactants A, B and C in pH = 7.13, [CO2] = 0.01M, T=20°C. (B) (I) Curves of concentration changes for reaction of CO2 uptake observed for the substrate A (which is the cis-[Cr(C2O4)(pm)(OH2)2]+ ion), product C as cis-[Cr(C2O4)(pm)(O2CO)]- ion, and intermediate product B. (II) Absorption spectra of the reactants A, B and C in pH = 6.5, [CO2] = 8.23M T=20°C.
Figure 5.Plots of rate expression (eq. 3) for different concentration carbon dioxide uptake by cis-[Cr(C2O4)(pm)(H2O)2]+.
Rate parameters for the carbon dioxide uptake reaction by cis-[Cr(C2O4)(pm)(OH2)2]+ Ion in T=20°C.
| CO2 was generated control sample | ||
|
| ||
| 1.08 | 5.61E-1 | 7.88E-1 |
| 1.87 | 5.68E-1 | 7.89E-1 |
| 2.13 | 5.7E-1 | 7.91E-1 |
| 3.33 | 5.94E-1 | 8.07E-1 |
| 4.12 | 6.03E-1 | 8.13E-1 |
|
| ||
| CO2 was generated upon addition of 1 mM H2O2 to the culture medium | ||
|
| ||
| 1.02 | 5.61E-1 | 7.82E-1 |
| 1.87 | 5.68E-1 | 7.89E-1 |
| 2.88 | 5.88E-1 | 8.03E-1 |
| 3.43 | 5.95E-1 | 8.08E-1 |
|
| ||
| CO2 was generated upon addition of 0.5 mM sodium pyruvate to the culture medium | ||
|
| ||
| 2.65 | 5.81E-1 | 7.95E-1 |
| 2.77 | 5.87E-1 | 7.98E-1 |
| 3.09 | 5.92E-1 | 8.06E-1 |
| 3.38 | 5.94E-1 | 8.07E-1 |
| 3.65 | 5.96E-1 | 8.09E-1 |
|
| ||
| CO2 was generated upon addition of 1 mM sodium pyruvate to the culture medium | ||
|
| ||
| 2.99 | 5.91E-1 | 8.05E-1 |
| 3.84 | 5.98E-1 | 8.10E-1 |
| 3.98 | 6.01E-1 | 8.11E-1 |
| 4.12 | 6.03E-1 | 8.13E-1 |
| 4.34 | 6.05E-1 | 8.15E-1 |
|
| ||
| CO2 was generated upon addition of 5 mM sodium pyruvate to the culture medium | ||
|
| ||
| 6.09 | 6.07E-1 | 8.18E-1 |
| 6.66 | 6.12E-1 | 8.21E-1 |
| 6.94 | 6.14E-1 | 8.23E-1 |
| 7.12 | 6.17E-1 | 8.25E-1 |
| 8.23 | 6.28E-1 | 8.29E-1 |
| 9.23 | 6.35E-1 | 8.55E-1 |
| 9.98 | 6.41E-1 | 8.63E-1 |
|
| ||
| CO2 was generated upon addition of 0.5 mM pyruvate and 1 mM H2O2 | ||
|
| ||
| 8.07 | 6.23E-1 | 8.27E-1 |
| 8.39 | 6.29E-1 | 8.32E-1 |
| 8.60 | 6.31E-1 | 8.47E-1 |
| 11.2 | 6.53E-1 | 8.91E-1 |
| 13.2 | 7.22E-1 | 9.31E-1 |
|
| ||
| CO2 was generated upon addition of 1 mM pyruvate and 1 mM H2O2 | ||
|
| ||
| 32.3 | 8.73E-1 | 1.09 |
| 33.6 | 9.02E-1 | 1.11 |
| 44.3 | 1.01 | 1.26 |
| 52.3 | 1.09 | 1.31 |
|
| ||
| CO2 was generated upon addition of 5 mM pyruvate and 1 mM H2O2 | ||
|
| ||
| 84.6 | 1.41 | 1.67 |
| 88.9 | 1.43 | 1.68 |
| 89.1 | 1.44 | 1.71 |
| 91.2 | 1.48 | 1.74 |
| 98.2 | 1.54 | 1.81 |
The error in k1[ms-1mM-1] and k2[ms-1mM-1] oscillates from 0.8% to 2.8%.
Figure 6.(A) Comparison of antioxidant protective effects of three concentration of pyruvate (0.5 mM, 1 mM and 5 mM) on viability of Osteosarcoma 143B cells exposed to 1 mM H2O2. The strongest protection was observed after 30 min of preincubation cells with 5 mM sodium pyruvate. The cytoprotective effect of 1 mM concentration was only partial. The lowest 0.5 mM sodium pyruvate was unable to protect against cell injury caused by H2O2. The results were analyzed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The results are presented as median, 5th percentile/95th percentile. (*) P<0.05 were considered statistically significant when compared to the cell viability upon addition 1 mM H2O2 alone;
(B) CO2 assessment in cell culture media upon addition of pyruvate and H2O2 The concentration was measured using novel stopped-flow method and specific CO2 detector - cis-[Cr(C2O4)(pm)(OH2)2]+. The results were analyzed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The data are presented as median, 5th percentile/95th percentile. (*) P<0.05 were considered statistically significant when compared with respective control;
(C) Pyruvate scavenging of endogenously produced H2O2 in cell media. The effect of catalase addition. The results of CO2 concentration upon addition pyruvate to the medium were compared with respective data obtained after preincubation with 1U/ml of catalase. The results were analyzed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The data are presented as median, 5th percentile/95th percentile. (*) P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.