| Literature DB >> 27872827 |
Girish Chandra Bhatt1, Shikha Jain1, Rashmi Ranjan Das1.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the role of zinc as add on treatment to the "recommended treatment" of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in children.Entities:
Keywords: Micronutrient; Nephrotic syndrome; Pediatric; Relapse; Zinc
Year: 2016 PMID: 27872827 PMCID: PMC5099591 DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i4.383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Pediatr ISSN: 2219-2808
Figure 1Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses flow diagram. RCTs: Randomized controlled trials.
Characteristics of included studies
| Arun et al[ | Hospital (out-patient), India | Number: 81 [Frequent relapse = 52 (zinc = 26; placebo = 26); Infrequent relapse = 29 (zinc = 14; placebo = 15)] Age: 1-16 yr Inclusion: SSNS with infrequent relapses or FRNS with prednisolone requirement ≤ 0.75 mg/kg on alternate days | Dose: Zinc sulfate 10 mg/d (1 h before or 2 h after meal) Duration: 12 mo | Frequency of relapses, number of relapses (mean), time to first relapse, adverse drug affects, proportion of infection associated relapses, and change in serum zinc level | Double blind placebo-controlled trial. ITT analysis not done. Small sample size (underpowered to show significant differences in the groups). Inclusion of infrequent relapsers may have diluted the significance of the findings. Authors proposed testing of a higher zinc dose along with immunological correlation |
| Sherali et al[ | Hospital (out-patient), Pakistan | Number: 60 (zinc = 30; placebo = 30) Age: 2-15 yr Inclusion: FRNS | Dose: Zinc sulfate 10 mg/d Duration: 6 mo | Frequency of relapses, number of relapses (mean), episodes of infections, adverse drug affects, and change in serum zinc level | Double blind placebo-controlled trial. ITT analysis not done. Small sample size. Allocation concealment not clear. Post-supplementation zinc level was not measured in all subjects. Authors proposed testing of a higher zinc dose in a larger cohort |
| Afzal et al[ | Hospital (out-patient), India | Number: 30 (zinc = 16; placebo = 14) Age (mean ± SD): 6.45 ± 2.92 yr Inclusion: FRNS ( | Dose: Zinc 20 mg/d Duration: 2 wk starting at the onset of an episode of infection (for 12 mo) | Frequency of relapses, number of relapses (mean), episodes of infections, adverse drug affects, and change in serum and hair zinc level | Open label trial. ITT analysis not clear. Small sample size. Post-supplementation. Authors proposed testing of a higher zinc dose in a larger population |
| Pardillo et al[ | Hospital (out-patient), Philippines | Number: 34 Age: Not clear (only children included) Inclusion: SSNS (majority) and SDNS | Dose: RDA Duration: 6 mo | Frequency of relapses, number of relapses (mean), episodes of infections, and adverse drug affects | Double blind placebo-controlled trial. ITT analysis not clear. Small sample size. Authors proposed testing of a higher zinc dose in a larger population |
SSNS: Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome; FRNS: Frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome; SDNS: Steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome; ITT: Intention-to-treat analysis; SD: Standard deviation; RDA: Recommended daily allowance.
Figure 2Frequency of relapses in 12 mo in case of frequent relapses/steroid dependent. IV: Inverse variance.
Figure 3Sustained remission/no relapse in case of frequent relapses/steroid dependent. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel.
Zinc for nephrotic syndrome (steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome)
| Frequency of relapses in 12 mo Follow-up: 12 mo | The mean frequency of relapses in 12 mo in the control groups was 2% | The mean frequency of relapses in 12 mo in the intervention groups was 0.2 lower (0.71 lower to 0.31 higher) | 81 (1 study) | Very low | |
| Frequency of relapses in 6 mo Follow-up: 12 mo | The mean frequency of relapses in 6 mo in the control groups was 19% | The mean frequency of relapses in 6 mo in the intervention groups was 0.19 lower (0.57 lower to 0.19 higher) | 81 (2 studies) | Very low | |
| Risk of relapse per year Follow-up: 12 mo | 725 per 1000 | 500 per 1000 (326 to 776) | RR = 0.69 (0.45 to 1.07) | 78 (1 study) | Very low |
| Mean length of time to next relapse Follow-up: 12 mo | The mean length of time to next relapse in the control groups was 1.5 mo | The mean length of time to next relapse in the intervention groups was 1.5 higher (0 to 0 higher) | 78 (1 study) | Very low | |
Single trial;
Small sample size;
The basis for the assumed risk (e.g., the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95%CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95%CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; GRADE: Working Group grades of evidence; high quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect; moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate; low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate; very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.
Zinc for nephrotic syndrome (frequent relapses/steroid dependent)
| Frequency of relapses in 12 mo Follow-up: 12 mo | The mean frequency of relapses in 12 mo in the control groups was 17% | The mean frequency of relapses in 12 mo in the intervention groups was 0.17 lower (0.39 lower to 0.04 higher) | 103 (2 studies) | Very low | |
| Frequency of relapses in 6 mo | The mean frequency of relapses in 6 mo in the control groups was 16% | The mean frequency of relapses in 6 mo in the intervention groups was 0.16 lower (0.6 lower to 0.3 higher) | 50 (2 studies) | Very low | |
| Sustained remission/no relapse Follow-up: 12 mo | 426 per 1000 | 605 per 1000 (422 to 873) | RR = 1.42 (0.99 to 2.05) | 103 (2 studies) | Very low |
| Proportion of infection episodes associated with relapse Follow-up: 12 mo | The mean proportion of infection episodes associated with relapse in the control groups was 17% | The mean proportion of infection episodes associated with relapse in the intervention groups was 0.17 lower (0 to 0 higher) | 30 (1 study) | Very low | |
Single trial;
Small sample size;
Allocation concealment not clear in one study;
The basis for the assumed risk (e.g., the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95%CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95%CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; GRADE: Working Group grades of evidence; high quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect; moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate; low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate; very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.