Literature DB >> 27871539

Liberal or restrictive fluid management during elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pim B B Schol1, Ivon M Terink2, Marcus D Lancé3, Hubertina C J Scheepers4.   

Abstract

This article reviews if a restrictive fluid management policy reduces the complication rate if compared to liberal fluid management policy during elective surgery. The PubMed database was explored by 2 independent researchers. We used the following search terms: "Blood transfusion (MESH); transfusion need; fluid therapy (MESH); permissive hypotension; fluid management; resuscitation; restrictive fluid management; liberal fluid management; elective surgery; damage control resuscitation; surgical procedures, operative (MESH); wounds (MESH); injuries (MESH); surgery; trauma patients." A secondary search in the Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library revealed no additional results. We selected randomized controlled trials performed during elective surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned to a restrictive fluid management policy or to a liberal fluid management policy during elective surgery. The patient characteristics and the type of surgery varied. All but 3 studies reported American Society of Anaesthesiologists groups 1 to 3 as the inclusion criterion. The primary outcome of interest is total number of patients with a complication and the complication rate. Secondary outcome measures are infection rate, transfusion need, postoperative rebleeding, hospital stay, and renal function. In total, 1397 patients were analyzed (693 restrictive protocol, 704 liberal protocol). Meta-analysis showed that in the restrictive group as compared with the liberal group, fewer patients experienced a complication (relative risk [RR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.78). The total complication rate (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.64), risk of infection (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79), and transfusion rate (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99) were also lower. The postoperative rebleeding did not differ in both groups: RR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.28-2.06). We conclude that compared with a liberal fluid policy, a restrictive fluid policy in elective surgery results in a 35% reduction in patients with a complication and should be advised as the preferred fluid management policy.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elective surgical procedures; Fluid therapy; Review, systematic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27871539     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  13 in total

1.  Does local factors alter discharge times after surgery?

Authors:  Mark C Kendall; Lucas J Castro-Alves
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Population-based volume kinetics of Ringer's lactate solution in patients undergoing open gastrectomy.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Lee; Yeong-Jin Choo; Yong-Hun Lee; Jin-Ho Rhim; Soo-Han Lee; Byung-Moon Choi; Sung-Tae Oh; Kyu-Taek Choi; Gyu-Jeong Noh
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Perioperative Clinical Trials in AKI.

Authors:  David R McIlroy; Marcos G Lopez; Frederic T Billings
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.299

4.  Effect of intraoperative fluid administration on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing McKeown esophagogastrectomy.

Authors:  Hongliang Wu; Wen Wang; Gefei Zhao; Qi Xue
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 5.  Intraoperative fluid management: Past and future, where is the evidence?

Authors:  Abdulmohsin A Al-Ghamdi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

6.  Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension is caused by a decrease in stroke volume in elderly patients.

Authors:  Charlotte Hofhuizen; Joris Lemson; Marc Snoeck; Gert-Jan Scheffer
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2019-03-04

7.  Perioperative liberal versus restrictive fluid strategies and postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and metanalysis on randomised-controlled trials in major abdominal elective surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Chiara Robba; Lorenzo Calabrò; Daniel Zambelli; Francesca Iannuzzi; Edoardo Molinari; Silvia Scarano; Denise Battaglini; Marta Baggiani; Giacomo De Mattei; Laura Saderi; Giovanni Sotgiu; Paolo Pelosi; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Restrictive versus liberal fluid resuscitation strategy, influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in mild obstetric hemorrhage: An open-label randomized controlled trial. (REFILL study).

Authors:  Pim B B Schol; Natascha M de Lange; Mallory D Woiski; Josje Langenveld; Luc J M Smits; Martine M Wassen; Yvonne M Henskens; Hubertina C J Scheepers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The role of increased body mass index in outcomes of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sicong Wang; Xu Liu; Qixing Chen; Can Liu; Changshun Huang; Xiangming Fang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Effects of Liberal Versus Restrictive Fluid Therapy on Renal Function Indices in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Mahzad Alimian; Masood Mohseni; Omid Moradi Moghadam; Seyed Alireza Seyed Siamdoust; Javad Moazzami
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.