Mark F Powell1, Douglas D Wellons2, Steve F Tran2, John M Zimmerman2, Michael A Frölich2. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA. Electronic address: mfpowell@uabmc.edu. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine specific risk factors that increase the failure rate of labor epidurals reactivated for use as a surgical block for postpartum tubal ligation. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Labor and delivery suite and operating rooms at the Women and Infants Center. PATIENTS: One hundred patients undergoing postpartum tubal ligation with an existing labor epidural that is documented to be within 2 cm of initial placement. MEASUREMENTS: Body mass index, patient satisfaction with her epidural during labor and delivery, time from delivery to reactivation for tubal ligation, depth to loss of resistance, and the need for top-ups during labor were recorded preoperatively. Failure to reactivate was recorded and defined as any patient that (1) did not achieve a T6 level to pinprick, (2) had perceived pain (pain score >3) that required administration of an intravenous opioid or local anesthetic infiltration, or (3) required conversion to general anesthesia. MAIN RESULTS: The overall success rate of reactivation was 78%. Significant risk factors for failure to reactivate were (1) poor patient satisfaction (P = .016), (2) increased time from delivery to reactivation (P = .044), and (3) the need for top-ups during labor and delivery (P = .032). CONCLUSION: Poor satisfaction score of the epidural during labor and delivery, increasing time from delivery to epidural reactivation for tubal ligation, and the need for top-ups during labor and delivery increase the incidence of reactivation failure. No correlation was found with body mass index or loss of resistance and failure to reactivate.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine specific risk factors that increase the failure rate of labor epidurals reactivated for use as a surgical block for postpartum tubal ligation. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING:Labor and delivery suite and operating rooms at the Women and Infants Center. PATIENTS: One hundred patients undergoing postpartum tubal ligation with an existing labor epidural that is documented to be within 2 cm of initial placement. MEASUREMENTS: Body mass index, patient satisfaction with her epidural during labor and delivery, time from delivery to reactivation for tubal ligation, depth to loss of resistance, and the need for top-ups during labor were recorded preoperatively. Failure to reactivate was recorded and defined as any patient that (1) did not achieve a T6 level to pinprick, (2) had perceived pain (pain score >3) that required administration of an intravenous opioid or local anesthetic infiltration, or (3) required conversion to general anesthesia. MAIN RESULTS: The overall success rate of reactivation was 78%. Significant risk factors for failure to reactivate were (1) poor patient satisfaction (P = .016), (2) increased time from delivery to reactivation (P = .044), and (3) the need for top-ups during labor and delivery (P = .032). CONCLUSION: Poor satisfaction score of the epidural during labor and delivery, increasing time from delivery to epidural reactivation for tubal ligation, and the need for top-ups during labor and delivery increase the incidence of reactivation failure. No correlation was found with body mass index or loss of resistance and failure to reactivate.