| Literature DB >> 27871295 |
Jifei Yang1, Zhijie Liu1, Qingli Niu1, Junlong Liu1, Rong Han1, Guiquan Guan1, Youquan Li1, Guangyuan Liu1, Jianxun Luo2, Hong Yin3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anaplasma phagocytophilum is wide spread throughout the world and impacts both human and animal health. Several distinct ecological clusters and ecotypes of the agent have been established on the basis of various genetic loci. However, information on the genetic variability of A. phagocytophilum isolates in China represents a gap in knowledge. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and genetic characterization of A. phagocytophilum in small ruminants in central and southeastern China.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; Anaplasma phagocytophilum; China; Ecotypes; Goats; Novel Anaplasma species; Sheep; groEL gene
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27871295 PMCID: PMC5117546 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1880-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Detection of A. phagocytophilum in sheep and goats
| Location | Species | No. infected/(%) | 16S rRNA variant | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Province | County | No. tested | No. positive (%) | ||
| Chongqing | Wanzhou | Goat | 24 | 7 (29.2) | variant 1 |
| Jiangjin | Goat | 30 | 0 (0) | – | |
| Guangxi | Pingxiang | Goat | 11 | 0 (0) | – |
| Jingxi | Goat | 19 | 2 (10.5) | variant 1 | |
| Guizhou | Dushan | Goat | 17 | 1 (5.9) | variant 1 |
| Rongjiang | Goat | 25 | 6 (24) | variant 1 | |
| Hebei | Wangdu | Sheep | 19 | 0 (0) | – |
| Hainan | Haikou | Goat | 28 | 4 (14.3) | variant 1, 2 |
| Sichuan | Hejiang | Goat | 32 | 18 (56.3) | variant 1 |
| Panzhihua | Goat | 32 | 1 (3.1) | variant 1 | |
| Shanxi | Lvliang | Sheep | 50 | 15 (30.0) | variant 1, 2 |
| Guangdong | Qingyuan | Goat | 30 | 6 (20.0) | variant 1 |
| Zhaoqing | Goat | 33 | 13 (39.4) | variant 1 | |
| Yunnan | Ruili | Goat | 4 | 3 (75.0) | variant 1 |
| Fuyuan | Goat | 7 | 2 (28.6) | variant 1 | |
| Yanshan | Goat | 15 | 3 (20.0) | variant 1 | |
| Hubei | Suizhou | Sheep | 45 | 25 (55.6) | variant 1 |
| Total | 421 | 106 (25.2) | |||
Primers and PCR amplification conditions
| Target gene | Primer name | Primer sequence (5’-3’) | Annealing temperature (°C) | Amplicon size (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16S rRNA | EE-1 | TCCTGGCTCAGAACGAACGCTGGCGGC | 55 | 1433 | [ |
| EE-2 | AGTCACTGACCCAACCTTAAATGGCTG | ||||
| SSAP2f | GCTGAATGTGGGGATAATTTAT | 55 | 641 | ||
| SSAP2r | ATGGCTGCTTCCTTTCGGTTA | ||||
|
| EphplgroEL(569)F | ATGGTATGCAGTTTGATCGC | 62 | 624 | [ |
| EphplgroEL(1193)R | TCTACTCTGTCTTTGCGTTC | ||||
| EphplgroEL(569)F | ATGGTATGCAGTTTGATCGC | 56 | 573 | ||
| EphgroEL(1142)R | TTGAGTACAGCAACACCACCGGAA |
Fig. 1Phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma spp. based on partial 16S rRNA gene sequences. Triangles indicate the sequences obtained in this study. Abbreviations: A. phago, Anaplasma phagocytophilum
Fig. 2Phylogenetic analysis of A. phagocytophilum strains based on partial groEL gene sequences. The sequences from this study are underlined