Literature DB >> 2787127

The effects of speed of injection on induction with propofol. A comparison with etomidate.

G W Gillies1, N W Lees.   

Abstract

One hundred and eighty female patients received either propofol 2.5 mg/kg or etomidate 0.3 mg/kg injected over 20, 40 or 80 seconds for induction of anaesthesia after premedication with temazepam 20 mg. The mean induction times for both etomidate and propofol were significantly reduced with increasing speed of injection. The mean induction times for etomidate were significantly less than propofol at the slower rates of injection. At each speed of injection, the decrease in systolic, mean and diastolic arterial blood pressures with etomidate were less than with propofol. The decrease in systolic blood pressure was not significantly affected by injection speed for either drug. Apnoea occurred significantly more frequently with propofol than with etomidate at each speed of injection and the incidence of apnoea greater than 60 seconds with propofol was significantly higher when injected over 20 seconds than 80 seconds. The incidence of pain on injection was unaffected by injection speed for either drug. The incidence of myoclonus and (or) hypertonus was significantly higher following etomidate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2787127     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11333.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  7 in total

1.  Laryngeal mask airway with spontaneous breathing.

Authors:  T Kitajima; M Harmer; M Rosen
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Proceedings of the British Pharmacological Society, British Pharmacology Section. 18-20 April 1990, Sheffield. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Differential effects of etomidate and its pyrrole analogue carboetomidate on the adrenocortical and cytokine responses to endotoxemia.

Authors:  Ervin Pejo; Yan Feng; Wei Chao; Joseph F Cotten; Ri Le Ge; Douglas E Raines
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  H M Bryson; B R Fulton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  The influence of injection rate on the hypnotic effect of propofol during anesthesia: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jasmin Blum; Eberhard Kochs; Nicole Forster; Gerhard Schneider
Journal:  PLoS Clin Trials       Date:  2006-07-28

6.  Determination of the appropriate propofol infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Qiongzhen Li; Qinghe Zhou; Wangpin Xiao; Hongmei Zhou
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Bispectral index to guide induction of anesthesia: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Dirk Rüsch; Christian Arndt; Leopold Eberhart; Scarlett Tappert; Dennis Nageldick; Hinnerk Wulf
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.217

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.