| Literature DB >> 2787113 |
Abstract
A total of 91 women provided reproductive histories, including usual frequency of coitus, at their enrollment into prospective studies conducted by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, in 1984-1986. Those data were compared with coital data recorded during study participation. Overall, women reported a significantly higher frequency of coitus on the interviewer-administered questionnaire than they recorded daily, by an average of 0.8 episodes per week. The size of this difference did not vary significantly for subgroups of women defined by demographic and other covariates. Excluding days of menses from the prospective records reduced the difference by 25%. The authors attribute the overestimate on the questionnaire to a tendency to report a coital frequency that might exist in the absence of travel, illness, and other transient factors that are likely to decrease frequency. This nondifferential information bias is unlikely to produce misleading comparisons or erroneous associations in epidemiologic studies of reproduction.Entities:
Keywords: Americas; Behavior; Bias; Coital Frequency; Coitus; Cultural Background; Data Collection; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Economic Factors; Error Sources; Ethnic Groups; Fertility; Fertility Measurements; Interviews; Measurement; Menstruation; Middle Income Population; North America; North Carolina; Northern America; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy History; Prospective Studies; Questionnaire Design; Questionnaires; Reproduction; Reproductive Behavior; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Sex Behavior; Social Class; Socioeconomic Factors; Socioeconomic Status; Studies; Survey Methodology; Surveys; United States; Whites
Mesh:
Year: 1989 PMID: 2787113 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Epidemiol ISSN: 0002-9262 Impact factor: 4.897