Literature DB >> 2787112

Spontaneous abortions in relation to consumption of tap water: an application of methods from survival analysis to a pregnancy follow-up study.

I Hertz-Picciotto1, S H Swan, R R Neutra, S J Samuels.   

Abstract

A previous study of pregnant women whose water supply was potentially contaminated revealed a significant increase in spontaneous abortions among those drinking tap as opposed to bottled water, regardless of exposure to the contamination. The relation between reported prenatal water consumption and risk of spontaneous abortion was therefore analyzed in an independent cohort of pregnancies seen in 1981-1982 at a health maintenance organization in three counties in northern California. The study used a nested case-control design. Since early miscarriages are left-truncated, gestational age at which a pregnancy comes to medical attention may confound results of pregnancy outcome studies. Risk set analyses were therefore conducted in two stages: 1) the life of table-adjusted risk for those drinking mainly bottled water was 8.4%; the risk for those drinking mainly tap water was 12.5%, and 2) the Cox proportional hazards model was used to control for multiple confounders, yielding a hazard ratio for spontaneous abortion of 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.1-2.0) for consumers of tap water compared with bottled water. Tap water drinkers whose home source of water included ground water had the greatest risk (13.8) and, after controlling for confounders, their hazard ratio was 1.7. Based on external data from comparable studies, bottled water drinkers appeared to have had unusually low risks, and tap water drinkers who received ground water may have had slightly high risks. Inconsistencies in the reporting of tap water consumption suggest recall bias. Causal factors could not be ruled out, however, although no reproductive toxins, either biological or chemical, have yet been identified in the tap water in this area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2787112     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  6 in total

1.  Severity and duration of nausea and vomiting symptoms in pregnancy and spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Ronna L Chan; Andrew F Olshan; David A Savitz; Amy H Herring; Julie L Daniels; Herbert B Peterson; Sandra L Martin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Risk of stillbirth from occupational and residential exposures.

Authors:  L M Pastore; I Hertz-Picciotto; J J Beaumont
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Accuracy loss due to selection bias in cohort studies with left truncation.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole; Aijun Ye; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 4.  Reproductive and developmental effects of disinfection by-products in drinking water.

Authors:  J S Reif; M C Hatch; M Bracken; L B Holmes; B A Schwetz; P C Singer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  When is it time to get married? Or when should the assay user and the assay developer collaborate?

Authors:  S H Swan; B L Lasley
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Assessment of water use for estimating exposure to tap water contaminants.

Authors:  G H Shimokura; D A Savitz; E Symanski
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.