BACKGROUND/AIMS: Whether angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are differentially associated with reductions in cardiovascular events and mortality in patients receiving maintenance dialysis is uncertain. We compared outcomes between ACE and ARB users among hypertensive, maintenance dialysis patients. METHODS: National retrospective cohort study of hypertensive, Medicare-Medicaid eligible patients initiating chronic dialysis between 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2005. The exposure of interest was new use of either an ACEI or ARB. Outcomes were all-cause mortality (ACM) and combined cardiovascular hospitalization or death (CV-endpoint). Cox proportion hazards models were used to compare the effect of ACEI vs ARB use on ACM and, separately, CV-endpoint. RESULTS: ACM models were based on 3,555 ACEI and 1,442 ARB new users, while CV-endpoint models included 3,289 ACEI and 1,346 ARB new users. After statistical adjustments, ACEI users had higher hazard ratios for ACM (AHR = 1.22, 99% CI 1.05-1.42) and CV-endpoint (AHR = 1.12, 99% CI 0.99-1.27). CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiating maintenance dialysis who received an ACEI faced an increased risk for mortality and a trend towards an increased risk for CV-endpoints when compared to patients who received an ARB. Validation of these results in a rigorous clinical trial is warranted.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Whether angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are differentially associated with reductions in cardiovascular events and mortality in patients receiving maintenance dialysis is uncertain. We compared outcomes between ACE and ARB users among hypertensive, maintenance dialysis patients. METHODS: National retrospective cohort study of hypertensive, Medicare-Medicaid eligible patients initiating chronic dialysis between 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2005. The exposure of interest was new use of either an ACEI or ARB. Outcomes were all-cause mortality (ACM) and combined cardiovascular hospitalization or death (CV-endpoint). Cox proportion hazards models were used to compare the effect of ACEI vs ARB use on ACM and, separately, CV-endpoint. RESULTS: ACM models were based on 3,555 ACEI and 1,442 ARB new users, while CV-endpoint models included 3,289 ACEI and 1,346 ARB new users. After statistical adjustments, ACEI users had higher hazard ratios for ACM (AHR = 1.22, 99% CI 1.05-1.42) and CV-endpoint (AHR = 1.12, 99% CI 0.99-1.27). CONCLUSIONS:Patients initiating maintenance dialysis who received an ACEI faced an increased risk for mortality and a trend towards an increased risk for CV-endpoints when compared to patients who received an ARB. Validation of these results in a rigorous clinical trial is warranted.
Authors: Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Elani Streja; Csaba P Kovesdy; Antigone Oreopoulos; Nazanin Noori; Jennie Jing; Allen R Nissenson; Mahesh Krishnan; Joel D Kopple; Rajnish Mehrotra; Stefan D Anker Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Jasper J Brugts; Laura van Vark; Martijn Akkerhuis; Michel Bertrand; Kim Fox; Jean-Jacques Mourad; Eric Boersma Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: James B Wetmore; Jonathan D Mahnken; Milind A Phadnis; Edward F Ellerbeck; Theresa I Shireman Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Theresa I Shireman; Milind A Phadnis; James B Wetmore; Xinhua Zhou; Sally K Rigler; John A Spertus; Edward F Ellerbeck; Jonathan D Mahnken Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2014-08-16 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Kevin E Chan; T Alp Ikizler; Jorge L Gamboa; Chang Yu; Raymond M Hakim; Nancy J Brown Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Sally K Rigler; James B Wetmore; Jonathan D Mahnken; Lei Dong; Edward F Ellerbeck; Theresa I Shireman Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 2.388