Literature DB >> 27870531

Evaluation of an innovative hands-on anatomy-centered ultrasound curriculum to supplement graduate gross anatomy education.

Danielle F Royer1, Ross Kessler2, Jeffrey R Stowell3.   

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) can enhance anatomy education, yet is incorporated into few non-medical anatomy programs. This study is the first to evaluate the impact of US training in gross anatomy for non-medical students in the United States. All 32 master's students enrolled in gross anatomy with the anatomy-centered ultrasound (ACUS) curriculum were recruited. Mean Likert ratings on pre- and post-course surveys (100% response rates) were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the ACUS curriculum in developing US confidence, and gauge its impact on views of US. Post-course, students reported significantly higher (P < 0.001) mean confidence ratings in five US skills (pre-course versus post-course mean): obtaining scans (3.13 ±1.04 versus 4.03 ±0.78), optimizing images (2.78 ±1.07 versus 3.75 ±0.92), recognizing artifacts (2.94 ±0.95 versus 3.97 ±0.69), distinguishing tissue types (2.88 ±0.98 versus 4.09 ±0.69), and identifying structures (2.97 ±0.86 versus 4.03 ±0.59), demonstrating the success of the ACUS curriculum in students with limited prior experience. Views on the value of US to anatomy education and to students' future careers remained positive after the course. End-of-semester quiz performance (91% response rate) provided data on educational outcomes. The average score was 79%, with a 90% average on questions about distinguishing tissues/artifacts, demonstrating positive learning outcomes and retention. The anatomy-centered ultrasound curriculum significantly increased confidence with and knowledge of US among non-medical anatomy students with limited prior training. Non-medical students greatly value the contributions that US makes to anatomy education and to their future careers. It is feasible to enhance anatomy education outside of medical training by incorporating US. Anat Sci Educ 10: 348-362.
© 2016 American Association of Anatomists. © 2016 American Association of Anatomists.

Keywords:  active learning; anatomy curriculum; graduate anatomy; gross anatomy education; learning strategies; medical education; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27870531     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  3 in total

1.  Integration of Ultrasonography into the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: Seven Years of Experience.

Authors:  Tatyana Kondrashova; Peter Kondrashov
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

2.  Assessment Methods in Medical Ultrasound Education.

Authors:  Elena Höhne; Florian Recker; Christoph Frank Dietrich; Valentin Sebastian Schäfer
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  Adaptation of an anatomy graduate course in ultrasound imaging from in-person to live, remote instruction during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Robert M DePhilip; Melissa M Quinn
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.