| Literature DB >> 27869768 |
Catalin Ilie Spataru1, Raluca Ianchis2, Cristian Petcu3, Cristina Lavinia Nistor4, Violeta Purcar5, Bogdan Trica6, Sabina Georgiana Nitu7, Raluca Somoghi8, Elvira Alexandrescu9, Florin Oancea10, Dan Donescu11.
Abstract
The present work is focused on the preparation of biocompatible silica particles from sodium silicate, stabilized by a vesicular system containing oleic acid (OLA) and its alkaline salt (OLANa). Silica nanoparticles were generated by the partial neutralization of oleic acid (OLA), with the sodium cation present in the aqueous solutions of sodium silicate. At the molar ratio OLA/Na⁺ = 2:1, the molar ratio (OLA/OLANa = 1:1) required to form vesicles, in which the carboxyl and carboxylate groups have equal concentrations, was achieved. In order to obtain hydrophobically modified silica particles, octadecyltriethoxysilane (ODTES) was added in a sodium silicate sol-gel mixture at different molar ratios. The interactions between the octadecyl groups from the modified silica and the oleyl chains from the OLA/OLANa stabilizing system were investigated via simultaneous thermogravimetry (TG) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (TG-DSC) analyses.A significant decrease in vaporization enthalpy and an increase in amount of ODTES were observed. Additionally, that the hydrophobic interaction between OLA and ODTES has a strong impact on the hybrids' final morphology and on their textural characteristics was revealed. The highest hydrodynamic average diameter and the most negative ζ potential were recorded for the hybrid in which the ODTES/sodium silicate molar ratio was 1:5. The obtained mesoporous silica particles, stabilized by the OLA/OLANa vesicular system, may find application as carriers for hydrophobic bioactive molecules.Entities:
Keywords: mesoporous silica; octadecyltriethoxysilane; oleic acid; sodium silicate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27869768 PMCID: PMC5133931 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17111936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Compositions of the investigated silica hybrids.
| Sample | ODTES (g) | ODTES/Sodium Silicate (mol/mol) | OLA/OLA + ODTES (mol/mol) | D a (nm) | Z b (mV) | Appearance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | Onlysodium silicate | 1 | 140 ± 1.124 | −63.3 ± 1.35 | opaque fluid |
| 2 | 3.07 | 1:1 | 0.67 | 163 ± 0.845 | −67.8 ± 1.53 | opaque gel |
| 3 | 1.5 | 1:2 | 0.805 | 217 ± 1.567 | −60.5 ± 0.948 | opaque gel |
| 4 | 0.61 | 1:5 | 0.91 | 311 ± 1.499 | −87.2 ± 2.21 | opaque gel |
| 5 | 0.3 | 1:10 | 0.954 | 307 ± 3.303 | −63.0 ± 2.56 | opaque fluid |
| 6 | 0.15 | 1:20 | 0.968 | 147 ± 1.130 | −64.8 ± 1.73 | opaque fluid |
a = hydrodynamic average diameter of the synthesized silica particles; b = ζ potential.
Figure 1Evolution of (a) average diameter (D) and (b) ζ potential (Z) of the water dispersed particles, depending on the amount of octadecyltriethoxysilane (ODTES) added in the sol–gel system (The lines are for guiding the reader. The experimental data were plotted, and the given curve was fitted with Table Curve 2D version v5.01 software. The fit standard error calculated by the software is written inside each chart).
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of ODTES/sodium silicate hybrids produced at different molar ratios. (The black arrows indicate the relevant peaks).
Thermogravimetry (TG) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (TG-DSC) coupled analysis results for the octadecyl-modified silica hybrids.
| Sample No. | Water Dispersions | Dried Hybrids | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSC | TGA/DTG (ΔG%/Tmax °C) | DSC (ΔH (J/g)/Ti (°C)) | |||||
| 10–200 °C | 0–200 °C | 200–400 °C | 400–700 °C | Residue at 700 °C % | 200–400 °C | 400–700 °C | |
| ΔH (J/g) | ΔG | ΔG/Tmax 2 | ΔG/Tmax 3 | ΔH/Ti2 | ΔH/Ti3 | ||
| 1 | 2573 | 8.69 | 44.50:364.0 | 28.94:457.0 | 17.88 | 16.49:337 | 21.45:426 |
| 2 | 472 | 6.59 | 29.63:366.7 | 45.64:495.0 | 18.25 | 5.56:338 | 68.1:466 |
| 3 | 249 | 5.46 | 35.60:369.1 | 40.43:488.6 | 18.51 | 2.63:385 | 67.92:448.3 |
| 4 | 1458 | 6.94 | 39.14:367.1 | 38.99:471.7 | 14.96 | 5.29:322.9 | 12.28:480.3 |
| 5 | 608 | 7.14 | 43.70:367.8 | 36.92:470.7 | 12.25 | 4.22:382.2 | 48.7:454.7 |
| 6 | 2543 | 6.48 | 40.15:363.8 | 34.90:488.6 | 18.51 | 4.43:375.3 | 20.82:452.5 |
| OLA | – | 10 | 73.6:356 | 16.3:– | 0 | 71.3:370 | – |
Figure 3Variation in the vaporization enthalpy of the water dispersions as a function of the ODTES amount used for silica hydrophobization (The line is for guiding the reader. The experimental data were plotted, and the given curve was fitted with Table Curve 2D version v5.01 software. The fit standard error calculated by the software is written inside the chart).
Figure 4DTA diagrams for the pristine silica hybrid (Sample 1) and for ODTES-modified silica hybrid (Sample 2—ODTES/sodium silicate = 1 mol/1 mol).
Figure 5Evolution of (a) the weight loss in the 200–400 °C (T2) and respectively 400–700 °C (T3) temperature ranges and (b) the enthalpy corresponding to the all hybrids thermal decomposition steps (The lines are for guiding the reader. The experimental data were plotted, and the given curve was fitted with Table Curve 2D version v5.01 software. The fit standard error calculated by the software is written inside each chart).
Figure 6TEM images of (a) the octadecyl-modified silica particles witha 1:1 ODTES/sodium silicate molar ratio (Sample 2) and (b) the octadecyl-modified silica particles with an ODTES/sodium silicate molar ratio = 1:10 (Sample 5).
Figure 7(a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms for the synthesized hybrids (Inset: enlarged diagram of N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of Sample 2); (b) the corresponding BJH pore size distribution from the adsorption branch; (c) the corresponding BJH pore size distribution from the desorption branch.
Textural properties of the C18-modified silica hybrids from N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms.
| Sample | SBET (m2·g−1) | SBJH ads. (m2·g−1) | Da a (nm) | Dd b (nm) | Pore Volume c (m3·g−1) | Vt d (m3·g−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 380.202 | 416.509 | 5.19 | 5.14 | 0.621 | 0.624 |
| 2 | 2.868 | 3.560 | 3.54 | 4.05 | 0.017 | 0.0167 |
| 3 | 114.364 | 104.409 | 4.22 | 3.86 | 0.308 | 0.318 |
| 4 | 165.261 | 115.717 | 3.47 | 3.86 | 0.293 | 0.325 |
| 5 | 291.300 | 268.893 | 4.20 | 3.86 | 0.524 | 0.551 |
| 6 | 294.393 | 319.468 | 6.60 | 5.49 | 0.572 | 0.571 |
a = Pore diameter (BJH adsorption branch); b = Pore diameter (BJH desorption branch); c = Pore volume (BJH adsorption branch); d = Total pore volume is estimated to be the liquid volume of nitrogen at p/p0 = 0.98.