Literature DB >> 27869361

Clinical outcomes according to molecular subtypes in stage II-III breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and radiotherapy.

Hakyoung Kim1, Won Park1, Seung Jae Huh1, Doo Ho Choi1, Jae Myoung Noh1, Young-Hyuck Im2, Jin Seok Ahn2, Yeon Hee Park2, Seok Jin Nam3, Seok Won Kim3, Jeong Eon Lee3, Eun Yoon Cho4.   

Abstract

AIM: We evaluated the tumor response and clinical outcomes according to molecular subtypes in stage II-III breast cancer patients who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery and radiotherapy.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 329 patients with clinical stage II-III breast cancer who received NAC followed by surgery and radiotherapy. Luminal A and B, HER2-enriched and triple-negative subgroups were identified.
RESULTS: The overall pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after NAC was 20.1% and the HER2-enriched subgroup had the highest pCR rate (43.6%), whereas luminal A showed the lowest rate of pCR (4.6%). The median follow-up duration was 55 months (range, 5-98 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 88.9% and 72.9%, respectively. In subgroup analysis, according to the pathologic response (pCR vs non-pCR), the triple-negative subtype exhibited a significant difference in 5-year OS rate (100.0% vs 71.6%, P = 0.005) and 5-year DFS rate (93.1% vs 55.1%, P < 0.001). A distinct survival difference according to molecular subtype was found, particularly in the non-pCR group (5-year OS and DFS, P < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The non-pCR group showed significantly decreased 5-year OS and DFS rates compared to the pCR group, especially in triple negative and HER2-enriched breast cancer patients. A significant difference in survival rates and molecular subtypes was found in patients who failed to attain pCR.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; molecular subtypes; neo-adjuvant chemotherapy; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27869361     DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1743-7555            Impact factor:   2.601


  5 in total

Review 1.  Learning to distinguish progressive and non-progressive ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Anna K Casasent; Mathilde M Almekinders; Charlotta Mulder; Proteeti Bhattacharjee; Deborah Collyar; Alastair M Thompson; Jos Jonkers; Esther H Lips; Jacco van Rheenen; E Shelley Hwang; Serena Nik-Zainal; Nicholas E Navin; Jelle Wesseling
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 69.800

2.  Outcomes for Patients with Residual Stage II/III Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (AFT-01).

Authors:  T J Stankowski-Drengler; J R Schumacher; B Hanlon; D Livingston-Rosanoff; K Van de Walle; C C Greenberg; L G Wilke; H B Neuman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Postmastectomy radiotherapy reduces locoregional and disease recurrence in patients with stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy.

Authors:  Xingxing Chen; Fan Xia; Jurui Luo; Jinli Ma; Zhaozhi Yang; Li Zhang; Yan Feng; Zhimin Shao; Xiaoli Yu; Xiaomao Guo
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Lymphovascular invasion can be better than pathologic complete response to predict prognosis in breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Young Jae Ryu; Shin Jae Kang; Jin Seong Cho; Jung Han Yoon; Min Ho Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Germline BRCA Mutation and Clinical Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients Focusing on Survival and Failure Patterns: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Koreans.

Authors:  Hakyoung Kim; Doo Ho Choi; Won Park
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.