Literature DB >> 27869084

Verification of Dose Distribution in Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy for Stage I Lung Cancer.

Daisuke Irie1, Jun-Ichi Saitoh2, Katsuyuki Shirai1, Takanori Abe1, Yoshiki Kubota1, Makoto Sakai1, Shin-Ei Noda1, Tatsuya Ohno1, Takashi Nakano1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate robustness of dose distribution of carbon-ion radiation therapy (C-ion RT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify factors affecting the dose distribution by simulated dose distribution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty irradiation fields for delivery of C-ion RT were analyzed in 20 patients with stage I NSCLC. Computed tomography images were obtained twice before treatment initiation. Simulated dose distribution was reconstructed on computed tomography for confirmation under the same settings as actual treatment with respiratory gating and bony structure matching. Dose-volume histogram parameters, such as %D95 (percentage of D95 relative to the prescribed dose), were calculated. Patients with any field for which the %D95 of gross tumor volume (GTV) was below 90% were classified as unacceptable for treatment, and the optimal target margin for such cases was examined.
RESULTS: Five patients with a total of 8 fields (10% of total number of fields analyzed) were classified as unacceptable according to %D95 of GTV, although most patients showed no remarkable change in the dose-volume histogram parameters. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that tumor displacement and change in water-equivalent pathlength were significant predictive factors of unacceptable cases (P<.001 and P=.002, respectively). The main cause of degradation of the dose distribution was tumor displacement in 7 of the 8 unacceptable fields. A 6-mm planning target volume margin ensured a GTV %D95 of >90%, except in 1 extremely unacceptable field.
CONCLUSIONS: According to this simulation analysis of C-ion RT for stage I NSCLC, a few fields were reported as unacceptable and required resetting of body position and reconfirmation. In addition, tumor displacement and change in water-equivalent pathlength (bone shift and/or chest wall thickness) were identified as factors influencing the robustness of dose distribution. Such uncertainties should be regarded in planning.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27869084     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  4 in total

1.  Visualisation of Range Shortening in Carbon Ion Beams and Washout of Positron Emitter: First-in-Human Report.

Authors:  Shintaro Shiba; Makoto Sakai; Masahiko Okamoto; Tatsuya Ohno
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Evaluation of the accuracy and clinical practicality of a calculation system for patient positional displacement in carbon ion radiotherapy at five sites.

Authors:  Yoshiki Kubota; Hayato Hayashi; Satoshi Abe; Saki Souda; Ryosuke Okada; Takayoshi Ishii; Mutsumi Tashiro; Masami Torikoshi; Tatsuaki Kanai; Tatsuya Ohno; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Evaluation of Intensity- and Contour-Based Deformable Image Registration Accuracy in Pancreatic Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Yoshiki Kubota; Masahiko Okamoto; Yang Li; Shintaro Shiba; Shohei Okazaki; Shuichiro Komatsu; Makoto Sakai; Nobuteru Kubo; Tatsuya Ohno; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Hypofractionated carbon-ion radiotherapy for stage I peripheral nonsmall cell lung cancer (GUNMA0701): Prospective phase II study.

Authors:  Jun-Ichi Saitoh; Katsuyuki Shirai; Tatsuji Mizukami; Takanori Abe; Takeshi Ebara; Tatsuya Ohno; Koichi Minato; Ryusei Saito; Masanobu Yamada; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.