Literature DB >> 2786897

Implantable functional neuromuscular stimulation in the tetraplegic hand.

M W Keith1, P H Peckham, G B Thrope, K C Stroh, B Smith, J R Buckett, K L Kilgore, J W Jatich.   

Abstract

Functional neuromuscular stimulation of the upper extremity provides manipulative capacity to persons with high level tetraplegia who have insufficient voluntary muscles available for tendon transfer surgery. We report an enhancement of the technique to include surgical implantation of a multichannel receiver-stimulator, sensory feedback stimulation, and tendon transfers. Tendon transfers were done with spastic, rather than voluntary motors employing standard surgical techniques. The system described has been operational for more than 1 1/2 years.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1989        PMID： 2786897     DOI： 10.1016/s0363-5023(89)80017-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN： 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  29 in total

1.  Control of a hand grasp neuroprosthesis using an electroencephalogram-triggered switch: demonstration of improvements in performance using wavepacket analysis.

Authors:  J M Heasman; T R D Scott; L Kirkup; R Y Flynn; V A Vare; C R Gschwind
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Implantable neurotechnologies: electrical stimulation and applications.

Authors:  Sudip Nag; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Injectable microstimulator for functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  G E Loeb; C J Zamin; J H Schulman; P R Troyk
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  An implanted upper-extremity neuroprosthesis using myoelectric control.

Authors:  Kevin L Kilgore; Harry A Hoyen; Anne M Bryden; Ronald L Hart; Michael W Keith; P Hunter Peckham
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Motor cortical prediction of EMG: evidence that a kinetic brain-machine interface may be robust across altered movement dynamics.

Authors:  A Cherian; M O Krucoff; L E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Sensory control of normal movement and of movement aided by neural prostheses.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  [Functional rehabilitation of spinal cord injured persons using neuroprostheses].

Authors:  R Rupp; R Abel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Mechanical fatigue resistance of an implantable branched lead system for a distributed set of longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes.

Authors:  A E Pena; S S Kuntaegowdanahalli; J J Abbas; J Patrick; K W Horch; R Jung
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  A real-time, 3-D musculoskeletal model for dynamic simulation of arm movements.

Authors:  Edward K Chadwick; Dimitra Blana; Antonie J Ton van den Bogert; Robert F Kirsch
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 10.  Biomimetic brain machine interfaces for the control of movement.

Authors:  Andrew H Fagg; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Victor de Lafuente; Karen A Moxon; Shamim Nemati; James M Rebesco; Ranulfo Romo; Sara A Solla; Jake Reimer; Dennis Tkach; Eric A Pohlmeyer; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.