Literature DB >> 27868181

Correlation between the high expression levels of cancer-germline genes with clinical characteristics in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Xinfeng Chen1,2, Liping Wang1,2, Dongli Yue1,2, Jinyan Liu1,3, Lan Huang1, Li Yang1, Ling Cao1,2, Guohui Qin1,2, Anqi Li1,2, Dan Wang1, Meng Wang1,4, Yu Qi5, Bin Zhang6, Pierre van der Bruggen7, Yi Zhang1,2,3,8.   

Abstract

Antigens encoded by cancer-germline genes are attractive targets for cancer immunotherapy. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the mRNA expression of cancer-germline genes, expression of the encoded proteins in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and their correlations with clinical characteristics. In addition, the effects of downregulation cancer-germline genes on ESCC cells were assessed in vitro. Our results showed that cancer-germline genes were frequently expressed in ESCC samples. The positive rates of in ESCC samples were: 87% of MAGE-A3, 60% of MAGE-A4, 65% of MAGE-C2, and 20% of NY-ESO-1 at mRNA level. MAGE-A3 expression was associated with age, lymph node metastasis and tumor stage (all P<0.05), while MAGE-C2 expression was only associated with tumor stage (P<0.05). Furthermore, the MAGE-A3 expressing patients had a poorer overall survival (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified MAGE-A3 as an independent poor prognostic marker in ESCC. In vitro assay, ESCC cell lines treated with specific siRNAs to down-regulate MAGE-A3 and MAGE-C2 resulted in decreased colony-formation and migration ability (P<0.05). Epithelial marker E-cadherin was up-regulated in siRNA-MAGE-A3/C2 cells compared to controls, whereas mesenchymal markers Vimentin, N-cadherin and Slug were downregulated (all P<0.05), suggesting a role for MAGE-A3/C2 in ESCC metastasis through inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. The present study revealed that cancer-germline genes and their encoded proteins were frequently expressed in ESCC tumor samples and were related to poor prognosis. Thus, cancer-germline genes may serve as useful biomarkers and potential targets for ESCC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27868181     DOI: 10.14670/HH-11-847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histol Histopathol        ISSN: 0213-3911            Impact factor:   2.303


  5 in total

1.  MAGE-A11 expression contributes to cisplatin resistance in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Stefan Hartmann; Leonie Zwick; Mario J J Scheurer; Andreas R Fuchs; Roman C Brands; Axel Seher; Hartmut Böhm; Alexander C Kübler; Urs D A Müller-Richter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Emerging roles of the MAGE protein family in stress response pathways.

Authors:  Rebecca R Florke Gee; Helen Chen; Anna K Lee; Christina A Daly; Benjamin A Wilander; Klementina Fon Tacer; Patrick Ryan Potts
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Expression and prognostic relevance of MAGE-A3 and MAGE-C2 in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xinfeng Chen; Liping Wang; Jinyan Liu; Lan Huang; Li Yang; Qun Gao; Xiaojuan Shi; Jieyao Li; Feng Li; Zhen Zhang; Song Zhao; Bin Zhang; Pierre Van der Bruggen; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  MAGEC2 Correlates With Unfavorable Prognosis And Promotes Tumor Development In HCC Via Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition.

Authors:  Xuefeng Gu; Yuan Mao; Chuanbing Shi; Wei Ye; Ning Hou; Li Xu; Yan Chen; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Differential expression of MAGEA6 toggles autophagy to promote pancreatic cancer progression.

Authors:  Yiu Huen Tsang; Yumeng Wang; Kathleen Kong; Caitlin Grzeskowiak; Oksana Zagorodna; Turgut Dogruluk; Hengyu Lu; Nicole Villafane; Venkata Hemanjani Bhavana; Daniela Moreno; Sarah H Elsea; Han Liang; Gordon B Mills; Kenneth L Scott
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 8.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.