| Literature DB >> 27868065 |
Li Hua Tang1, Qi Tan2, Da Peng Bao2, Xue Hong Zhang3, Hua Hua Jian3, Yan Li2, Rui Heng Yang2, Ying Wang2.
Abstract
Light-induced brown film (BF) formation by the vegetative mycelium of Lentinula edodes is important for ensuring the quantity and quality of this edible mushroom. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanism underlying this phenotype is still unclear. In this study, a comparative proteomic analysis of mycelial BF formation in L. edodes was performed. Seventy-three protein spots with at least a twofold difference in abundance on two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) maps were observed, and 52 of them were successfully identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF/MS). These proteins were classified into the following functional categories: small molecule metabolic processes (39%), response to oxidative stress (5%), and organic substance catabolic processes (5%), followed by oxidation-reduction processes (3%), single-organism catabolic processes (3%), positive regulation of protein complex assembly (3%), and protein metabolic processes (3%). Interestingly, four of the proteins that were upregulated in response to light exposure were nucleoside diphosphate kinases. To our knowledge, this is the first proteomic analysis of the mechanism of BF formation in L. edodes. Our data will provide a foundation for future detailed investigations of the proteins linked to BF formation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27868065 PMCID: PMC5102706 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5837293
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Comparison of the surface of the mycelium grown under different illumination conditions. (a) 50 d of 24 h of darkness; (b) 50 d of a 12 h dark/light regimen (sample 313C).
Figure 2Representative 2DE protein patterns from Lentinula edodes mycelium sample 313W that did not produce a brown film (a) and sample 313C (b) that produced a brown film. 313W indicates samples that did not form a brown film when cultivated in the dark, while 313C denotes samples that formed a brown film when cultivated under light/dark conditions. Proteins were loaded on a 24 cm IPG strip with a nonlinear immobilized pH gradient ranging from 3 to 10 for isoelectric focusing, followed by electrophoresis in a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and silver staining.
Figure 3Functional category distribution of the differentially expressed proteins. Pie charts representing the distribution of the 52 identified proteins according to biological function are shown.
Figure 4Validation of proteomic data by RT-qPCR. Open and solid bars indicate fold changes obtained from proteomic data and by RT-qPCR, respectively. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments. The full name of the gene evaluated by qPCR and their fold changes were 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase (idh, 1.841), NAD-aldehyde dehydrogenase (ndh, 1.054), nucleoside diphosphate kinase (ndk, 2.645), adenosine kinase (ake, −1.189), 20S proteasome subunit (pst, 1.998), proteasome component pts1 (pcp, 1.26), heat shock cognate 70 (hsc, 1.457), manganese superoxide dismutase (msd, 1.146), alcohol dehydrogenase (adh, −1.293), glyoxalase (gly, 1.247), and glutathione S-transferase-like protein (gtp, −1.549). The reference gene of qPCR was 18S rRNA.