| Literature DB >> 27867934 |
Jiajie Xu1, Weina He2, Zhonghua Wang2, Dijun Zhang2, Jing Sun2, Jun Zhou2, Yanyan Li3, Xiurong Su2.
Abstract
Municipal and industrial wastewater is often discharged into the environment without appropriate treatment, especially in developing countries. As a result, many rivers and oceans are contaminated. It is urgent to control and administer treatments to these contaminated rivers and oceans. However, most mechanisms of bacterial colonization in contaminated rivers and oceans were unknown, especially in sewage outlets. We found Shewanella putrefaciens to be the primary bacteria in the terrestrial sewage wastewater outlets around Ningbo City, China. Therefore, in this study, we applied a combination of differential proteomics, metabolomics, and real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR techniques to identify bacteria intracellular metabolites. We found S. putrefaciens had 12 different proteins differentially expressed in freshwater culture than when grown in wastewater, referring to the formation of biological membranes (Omp35, OmpW), energy metabolism (SOD, deoxyribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase), fatty acid metabolism (beta-ketoacyl synthase), secondary metabolism, TCA cycle, lysine degradation (2-oxoglutarate reductase), and propionic acid metabolism (succinyl coenzyme A synthetase). The sequences of these 12 differentially expressed proteins were aligned with sequences downloaded from NCBI. There are also 27 differentially concentrated metabolites detected by NMR, including alcohols (ethanol, isopropanol), amines (dimethylamine, ethanolamine), amino acids (alanine, leucine), amine compounds (bilinerurine), nucleic acid compounds (nucleosides, inosines), and organic acids (formate, acetate). Formate and ethanolamine show significant difference between the two environments and are possibly involved in energy metabolism, glycerophospholipid and ether lipids metabolism to provide energy supply, and material basis for engraftment in sewage. Because understanding S. putrefaciens's biological mechanism of colonization (protein, gene express, and metabolites) in terrestrial sewage outlets is so important to administering and improving contaminated river and to predicting and steering performance, we delved into the biological mechanism that sheds light on the effect of environmental conditions on metabolic pathways.Entities:
Keywords: Shewanella putrefaciens; differential proteomics; metabolomics; real-time quantitative PCR
Year: 2016 PMID: 27867934 PMCID: PMC5095135 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Figure 1Map of 10 terrestrial sewage outlets sites in coastal areas of Ningbo.
The protocol isoelectric focusing of protein samples.
| Phase | Voltage (V) | Duration (h) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 500 | 1 |
| 2 | 1000 | 1 |
| 3 | 2000 | 3 |
| 4 | 500 | 1 |
| 5 | Urea 6M, SDS 2% (W/V), 1.5M pH 8.8 Tris–HCl 25% (V/V), glycerine 20% (V/V), DTT 0.13M | 0.25 |
| 6 | Urea 6M, SDS 2% (W/V), 1.5M pH 8.8 Tris–HCl 25% (V/V), glycerine 20% (V/V), iodoacetamide 0.135M | 0.25 |
Figure 2(I) SDS-PAGE electropherogram. D, fresh water; W, sewage. (II) The 2D-PAGE protein map of S. putrefaciens under the two different environment. A, Fresh water; B, sewage. Arrows and spot numbers refer to differentially expressed proteins. (III) The RT-qPCR of differential expression gene of S. putrefaciens. D, fresh water; W, sewage.
The mass spectrometry result of different proteins from .
| No. | Accession number | Protein name | Matched peptides | Mascot score | Theoretical MW (kDa)/PI | Threshold ( | Species |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | gi|386312552 | Outer membrane porin, Omp35 | 13 | 148 | 37,959/4.64 | 56 | |
| 2 | gi|146293916 | Deoxyribose-phosphate aldolase | 8 | 92 | 27,568/4.75 | 56 | |
| 3 | gi|386313173 | Outer membrane protein, OmpW | 3 | 96 | 22,968/4.76 | 56 | |
| 4 | gi|146292787 | Superoxide dismutase | 6 | 68 | 21,613/4.94 | 56 | |
| 5 | gi|146292406 | Hypothetical protein Sputcn32_1303 | 7 | 140 | 19,533/5.37 | 56 | |
| 6 | gi|146294960 | Extracellular solute-binding protein | 12 | 134 | 29,511/6.15 | 56 | |
| 7 | gi|146292153 | OmpA/MotB domain-containing protein | 7 | 81 | 40,022/4.82 | 56 | |
| 8 | gi|146293541 | Beta-ketoacyl synthase | 8 | 101 | 44,387/5.29 | 56 | |
| 9 | gi|146294855 | Elongation factor Tu | 15 | 299 | 43,547/5.08 | 56 | |
| 10 | gi|146293364 | Dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase | 5 | 60 | 43,234/5.34 | 56 | |
| 11 | gi|146293363 | Succinyl-CoA synthetase subunit beta | 9 | 166 | 41,699/5.32 | 56 | |
| 12 | gi|146291902 | Ribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase | 4 | 63 | 34,249/5.46 | 56 |
Figure 3(I) NMR ownership figure of metabolites from S. putrefaciens. (II) Expression levels of bacteria in freshwater and water environment of high contribution rate metabolites. W, water group (control); D, sewage group (experimental) (**P < 0.01). (III) The PLS analysis graphics of intracellular metabolites from S. putrefaciens. VIP, variable importance in projection.
Intracellular metabolites information table of .
| Concentration (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Name | Fresh water | Sewage | Ratio | NMR number |
| Alcohols | Ethanol | 0.0098 | 0.0091 | 0.93 | 7 |
| Isopropanol | 0.0007 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| Amines | Dimethylamine | 0.0016 | 0.0019 | 1.23 | 18 |
| Ethanolamine | 0.018 | 0.056 | 3.15 | 20 | |
| Methylamine | 0.0075 | 0 | 0 | 16 | |
| Putrescine | 0.017 | 0 | 0 | 19 | |
| Amino acids | Alanine | 0.0099 | 0.0094 | 0.95 | 10 |
| Aspartate | 0 | 0 | – | 17 | |
| Betaine | 0.00067 | 0 | 0 | 24 | |
| Glutamate | 0 | 0 | – | 13 | |
| Isoleucine | 0.0013 | 0.0032 | 2.46 | 1 | |
| Leucine | 0.0012 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Methionine | 0.0016 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| Phenylalanine | 0 | 0 | – | 30 | |
| Threonine | 0.0012 | 0.0022 | 1.81 | 8 | |
| Valine | 0.0018 | 0.0042 | 2.33 | 4 | |
| 2-Alanine | 0 | 0 | – | 21 | |
| Ammoniums compounds | Choline | 0.00063 | 0.0007 | 1.11 | 22 |
| sn-Glycero-3-phosphocholine | 0 | 0 | – | 23 | |
| Nucleic acid components | Adenosine | 0.0070 | 0 | 0 | 33 |
| Cytidine | 0.0060 | 0 | 0 | 32 | |
| Guanosine | 0.0075 | 0.0074 | 0.99 | 26 | |
| Inosine | 0.0044 | 0.0040 | 0.92 | 28 | |
| Thymine | 0 | 0 | – | 11 | |
| Uracil | 0.013 | 0.021 | 1.60 | 27 | |
| Uridine | 0.00053 | 0 | 0 | 25 | |
| Organic acids | 2-Hydroxybutyrate | 0.0053 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Acetate | 0.024 | 0.0080 | 0.33 | 12 | |
| Formate | 0.33 | 0.0054 | 0.02 | 34 | |
| Fumarate | 0 | 0 | – | 29 | |
| Isobutyrate | 0.0008 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |
| Lactate | 0.0082 | 0.0090 | 1.09 | 9 | |
| Succinate | 0.0021 | 0.0017 | 0.80 | 15 | |
| Others | Nicotinurate | 0.0192 | 0 | 0 | 31 |
.
*0.01 < P < 0.05.
**P < 0.01.
Figure 4Rewiring of transcriptional regulatory networks in the carbohydrate mechanisms of . Genes that encode the enzymes in this schematic are referred to by their commonly used names. KDG-6-P, 2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate; P, phosphate; FDH, formaldehyde; 2PGC, 2 phosphoglycerate; Gly, glycine; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate.