Carlo C Passerotti1, José A Cruz1, Sabrina T Reis2, Marcelo T Okano2, Ricardo J Duarte2, Miguel Srougi2, Hiep T Nguyen3. 1. Urology Department, College of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil; Center for Robotic Surgery, German Hospital Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Urology Department, College of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Urology Department, Cardon Children Medical Center, Mesa, Ariz., USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Currently, there is no standardized training protocol to teach surgeons how to deal with vascular injuries during laparoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized algorithm for managing vascular injury during laparoscopic nephrectomies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The performance of 6 surgeons was assessed during 10 laparoscopic nephrectomies in a porcine model. During the first and tenth operations, an injury was made in the renal vein without warning the surgeon. After the first procedure, the surgeons were instructed on how to proceed in dealing with the vascular injury, according to an algorithm developed by the designers of this study. The performance of each surgeon before and after learning the algorithm was assessed. RESULTS: After learning the algorithm there was a decreased blood loss from 327 ± 403.11 ml to 37 ± 18.92 ml (p = 0.031) and decreased operative time from 43 ± 14.53 min to 27 ± 8.27 min (p = 0.015). There was also improvement in the time to start lesion repair from 147 ± 117.65 sec to 51 ± 39.09 sec (p = 0.025). There was a trend toward improvement in the reaction time to the injury (22 ± 21.55 sec vs. 14 ± 6.39, p = 0.188), the time required to control the bleeding (50 ± 94.2 sec vs. 14 ± 6.95 sec, p = 0.141), and the total time required to completely repair of the vascular injury (178 ± 170.4 sec vs. 119 ± 183.87 sec, p = 0.302). CONCLUSION: A standardized algorithm may help to reduce the potential risks associated with laparoscopic surgery. Further studies will help to refine and determine the benefits of standardized protocols such as that developed in this study for the management of life-threatening laparoscopic complications.
OBJECTIVES: Currently, there is no standardized training protocol to teach surgeons how to deal with vascular injuries during laparoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized algorithm for managing vascular injury during laparoscopic nephrectomies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The performance of 6 surgeons was assessed during 10 laparoscopic nephrectomies in a porcine model. During the first and tenth operations, an injury was made in the renal vein without warning the surgeon. After the first procedure, the surgeons were instructed on how to proceed in dealing with the vascular injury, according to an algorithm developed by the designers of this study. The performance of each surgeon before and after learning the algorithm was assessed. RESULTS: After learning the algorithm there was a decreased blood loss from 327 ± 403.11 ml to 37 ± 18.92 ml (p = 0.031) and decreased operative time from 43 ± 14.53 min to 27 ± 8.27 min (p = 0.015). There was also improvement in the time to start lesion repair from 147 ± 117.65 sec to 51 ± 39.09 sec (p = 0.025). There was a trend toward improvement in the reaction time to the injury (22 ± 21.55 sec vs. 14 ± 6.39, p = 0.188), the time required to control the bleeding (50 ± 94.2 sec vs. 14 ± 6.95 sec, p = 0.141), and the total time required to completely repair of the vascular injury (178 ± 170.4 sec vs. 119 ± 183.87 sec, p = 0.302). CONCLUSION: A standardized algorithm may help to reduce the potential risks associated with laparoscopic surgery. Further studies will help to refine and determine the benefits of standardized protocols such as that developed in this study for the management of life-threatening laparoscopic complications.
Entities:
Keywords:
Blood loss; Complication; Laparoscopy; Training
Authors: José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz; Carlo Camargo Passerotti; Rodrigo Marcus Cunha Frati; Sabrina Thalita Dos Reis; Marcelo Takeo Rufato Okano; Eder Maxwell Gouveia; Karlo Dornelles Biolo; Ricardo Jordão Duarte; Hiep Nguyen; Miguel Srougi Journal: J Endourol Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Jerome M Laurence; Vincent W T Lam; Mary E Langcake; Michael J Hollands; Michael D Crawford; Henry C C Pleass Journal: ANZ J Surg Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 1.872
Authors: Lauren B Mashaud; Antonio O Castellvi; Lisa A Hollett; Deborah C Hogg; Seifu T Tesfay; Daniel J Scott Journal: Surgery Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Lee Richstone; Casey Seideman; Lauren Baldinger; Sompol Permpongkosol; Thomas W Jarrett; Li-Ming Su; Christian Pavlovich; Louis R Kavoussi Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 7.450