Literature DB >> 27866995

An integrated decision making approach for assessing healthcare waste treatment technologies from a multiple stakeholder.

Hua Shi1, Hu-Chen Liu2, Ping Li3, Xue-Guo Xu1.   

Abstract

With increased worldwide awareness of environmental issues, healthcare waste (HCW) management has received much attention from both researchers and practitioners over the past decade. The task of selecting the optimum treatment technology for HCWs is a challenging decision making problem involving conflicting evaluation criteria and multiple stakeholders. In this paper, we develop an integrated decision making framework based on cloud model and MABAC method for evaluating and selecting the best HCW treatment technology from a multiple stakeholder perspective. The introduced framework deals with uncertain linguistic assessments of alternatives by using interval 2-tuple linguistic variables, determines decision makers' relative weights based on the uncertainty and divergence degrees of every decision maker, and obtains the ranking of all HCW disposal alternatives with the aid of an extended MABAC method. Finally, an empirical example from Shanghai, China, is provided to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach. Results indicate that the methodology being proposed is more suitable and effective to handle the HCW treatment technology selection problem under vague and uncertain information environment.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cloud model; HCW treatment technology; Healthcare waste management; MABAC method

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27866995     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  3 in total

1.  A novel hybrid multi-criteria group decision-making approach with intuitionistic fuzzy sets to design reverse supply chains for COVID-19 medical waste recycling channels.

Authors:  Sen Liu; Jinxin Zhang; Ben Niu; Ling Liu; Xiaojun He
Journal:  Comput Ind Eng       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 7.180

2.  Medical waste management in three areas of rural China.

Authors:  Qiufeng Gao; Yaojiang Shi; Di Mo; Jingchun Nie; Meredith Yang; Scott Rozelle; Sean Sylvia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Review of Current Healthcare Waste Management Methods and Their Effect on Global Health.

Authors:  Christina Kenny; Anushree Priyadarshini
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.