Literature DB >> 27866741

Assessment of indoor air quality in office buildings across Europe - The OFFICAIR study.

Corinne Mandin1, Marilena Trantallidi2, Andrea Cattaneo3, Nuno Canha4, Victor G Mihucz5, Tamás Szigeti5, Rosanna Mabilia6, Erica Perreca6, Andrea Spinazzè3, Serena Fossati2, Yvonne De Kluizenaar7, Eric Cornelissen7, Ioannis Sakellaris8, Dikaia Saraga8, Otto Hänninen9, Eduardo De Oliveira Fernandes10, Gabriela Ventura10, Peder Wolkoff11, Paolo Carrer2, John Bartzis8.   

Abstract

The European project OFFICAIR aimed to broaden the existing knowledge regarding indoor air quality (IAQ) in modern office buildings, i.e., recently built or refurbished buildings. Thirty-seven office buildings participated in the summer campaign (2012), and thirty-five participated in the winter campaign (2012-2013). Four rooms were investigated per building. The target pollutants were twelve volatile organic compounds, seven aldehydes, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5μm (PM2.5). Compared to other studies in office buildings, the benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene concentrations were lower in OFFICAIR buildings, while the α-pinene and d-limonene concentrations were higher, and the aldehyde, nitrogen dioxide and PM2.5 concentrations were of the same order of magnitude. When comparing summer and winter, significantly higher concentrations were measured in summer for formaldehyde and ozone, and in winter for benzene, α-pinene, d-limonene, and nitrogen dioxide. The terpene and 2-ethylhexanol concentrations showed heterogeneity within buildings regardless of the season. Considering the average of the summer and winter concentrations, the acetaldehyde and hexanal concentrations tended to increase by 4-5% on average with every floor level increase, and the nitrogen dioxide concentration tended to decrease by 3% on average with every floor level increase. A preliminary evaluation of IAQ in terms of potential irritative and respiratory health effects was performed. The 5-day median and maximum indoor air concentrations of formaldehyde and ozone did not exceed their respective WHO air quality guidelines, and those of acrolein, α-pinene, and d-limonene were lower than their estimated thresholds for irritative and respiratory effects. PM2.5 indoor concentrations were higher than the 24-h and annual WHO ambient air quality guidelines.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IAQ; Particulate matter; Seasonal variability; Spatial variability; Terpene; VOC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27866741     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  11 in total

1.  Evidence of indoor sinks for formaldehyde through the field measurements using passive flux sampler and mass balance.

Authors:  Herve Plaisance; Alodie Blondel; Valerie Desauziers; Pierre Mocho
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A comprehensive air quality investigation at an aquatic centre: Indoor/outdoor comparisons.

Authors:  Evangelos I Tolis; Giorgos Panaras; John G Bartzis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Indoor concentrations of VOCs in beauty salons; association with cosmetic practices and health risk assessment.

Authors:  Mostafa Hadei; Philip K Hopke; Abbas Shahsavani; Mahbobeh Moradi; Maryam Yarahmadi; Baharan Emam; Noushin Rastkari
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.646

Review 4.  Comprehensive review of 2-ethyl-1-hexanol as an indoor air pollutant.

Authors:  Takanari Wakayama; Yuki Ito; Kiyoshi Sakai; Mio Miyake; Eiji Shibata; Hiroyuki Ohno; Michihiro Kamijima
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 5.  Indoor Air Quality in Buildings: A Comprehensive Review on the Factors Influencing Air Pollution in Residential and Commercial Structure.

Authors:  Mehzabeen Mannan; Sami G Al-Ghamdi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Assessment of Airborne Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Shahrekord Hospitals.

Authors:  Davood Jalili; MohamadHadi Dehghani; Abdolmajid Fadaei; Mahmood Alimohammadi
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2021-04-24

7.  Volatile Organic Compounds in Finnish Office Environments in 2010-2019 and Their Relevance to Adverse Health Effects.

Authors:  Kaisa Wallenius; Hanna Hovi; Jouko Remes; Selma Mahiout; Tuula Liukkonen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Detailed Investigation of the Contribution of Gas-Phase Air Contaminants to Exposure Risk during Indoor Activities.

Authors:  Anna L Hodshire; Ellison Carter; James M Mattila; Vito Ilacqua; Jordan Zambrana; Jonathan P D Abbatt; Andrew Abeleira; Caleb Arata; Peter F DeCarlo; Allen H Goldstein; Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz; Marina E Vance; Chen Wang; Delphine K Farmer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 11.357

9.  Indoor Carbon Dioxide, Fine Particulate Matter and Total Volatile Organic Compounds in Private Healthcare and Elderly Care Facilities.

Authors:  Alexandre Baudet; Estelle Baurès; Olivier Blanchard; Pierre Le Cann; Jean-Pierre Gangneux; Arnaud Florentin
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-03-12

10.  Quantitative Health Risk Assessment of the Chronic Inhalation of Chemical Compounds in Healthcare and Elderly Care Facilities.

Authors:  Anaïs Colas; Alexandre Baudet; Pierre Le Cann; Olivier Blanchard; Jean-Pierre Gangneux; Estelle Baurès; Arnaud Florentin
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.