BACKGROUND: There are still uncertainties on the psychometric validity of the DSM-5 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) criteria for its use in the adult population. We aim to describe the adult ADHD phenotype, to test the psychometric properties of the DSM-5 ADHD criteria, and to calculate the resulting prevalence in a population-based sample in their thirties. METHOD: A cross-sectional evaluation using the DSM-5 ADHD criteria was carried out in 3574 individuals from the 1982 Pelotas Birth Cohort. Through receiver operator curve, latent and regression analyses, we obtained parameters on construct and discriminant validity. Still, prevalence rates were calculated for different sets of criteria. RESULTS: The latent analysis suggested that the adult ADHD phenotype is constituted mainly by inattentive symptoms. Also, inattention symptoms were the symptoms most associated with impairment. The best cut-off for diagnosis was four symptoms, but sensitivity and specificity for this cut-off was low. ADHD prevalence rates were 2.1% for DSM-5 ADHD criteria and 5.8% for ADHD disregarding age-of-onset criterion. CONCLUSIONS: The bi-dimensional ADHD structure proposed by the DSM demonstrated both construct and discriminant validity problems when used in the adult population, since inattention is a much more relevant feature in the adult phenotype. The use of the DSM-5 criteria results in a higher prevalence of ADHD when compared to those obtained by DSM-IV, and prevalence would increase almost threefold when considering current ADHD syndrome. These findings suggest a need for further refinement of the criteria for its use in the adult population.
BACKGROUND: There are still uncertainties on the psychometric validity of the DSM-5 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) criteria for its use in the adult population. We aim to describe the adult ADHD phenotype, to test the psychometric properties of the DSM-5 ADHD criteria, and to calculate the resulting prevalence in a population-based sample in their thirties. METHOD: A cross-sectional evaluation using the DSM-5 ADHD criteria was carried out in 3574 individuals from the 1982 Pelotas Birth Cohort. Through receiver operator curve, latent and regression analyses, we obtained parameters on construct and discriminant validity. Still, prevalence rates were calculated for different sets of criteria. RESULTS: The latent analysis suggested that the adult ADHD phenotype is constituted mainly by inattentive symptoms. Also, inattention symptoms were the symptoms most associated with impairment. The best cut-off for diagnosis was four symptoms, but sensitivity and specificity for this cut-off was low. ADHD prevalence rates were 2.1% for DSM-5 ADHD criteria and 5.8% for ADHD disregarding age-of-onset criterion. CONCLUSIONS: The bi-dimensional ADHD structure proposed by the DSM demonstrated both construct and discriminant validity problems when used in the adult population, since inattention is a much more relevant feature in the adult phenotype. The use of the DSM-5 criteria results in a higher prevalence of ADHD when compared to those obtained by DSM-IV, and prevalence would increase almost threefold when considering current ADHD syndrome. These findings suggest a need for further refinement of the criteria for its use in the adult population.
Authors: Stephanie S J Morris; Erica D Musser; Rachel B Tenenbaum; Anthony R Ward; Jessica Martinez; Joseph S Raiker; Erika K Coles; Cameron Riopelle Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2020-03
Authors: Diana Müller; Eugenio H Grevet; Natasha A Figueira da Silva; Cibele E Bandeira; Eduardo Barbosa; Eduardo S Vitola; Mariele F Charão; Rafael Linden; Luis A Rohde; João K N Ramos; Bruna S da Silva; Diego L Rovaris; Claiton H D Bau Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 13.437
Authors: Arthur Caye; James Swanson; Anita Thapar; Margaret Sibley; Louise Arseneault; Lily Hechtman; L Eugene Arnold; Janni Niclasen; Terrie Moffitt; Luis Augusto Rohde Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Claiton H D Bau; Diego L Rovaris; Cibele E Bandeira; Eugenio H Grevet; Renata B Cupertino; Maria E de Araujo Tavares; Clara S Gusmão; Djenifer B Kappel; Eduardo S Vitola; Felipe A Picon; Luís A Rohde; Bruna S da Silva Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 3.575