| Literature DB >> 27866103 |
Irene Merino-Jimenez1, Veronica Celorrio2, David J Fermin2, John Greenman3, Ioannis Ieropoulos4.
Abstract
Urine is an excellent fuel for electricity generation in Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs), especially with practical implementations in mind. Moreover, urine has a high content in nutrients which can be easily recovered. Struvite (pan> class="Chemical">MgNH4PO4·6H2O) crystals naturally precipitate in urine, but this reaction can be enhanced by the introduction of additional magnesium. In this work, the effect of magnesium additives on the power output of the MFCs and on the catholyte generation is evaluated. Several magnesium sources including MgCl2, artificial sea water and a commercially available sea salts mixture for seawater preparation (SeaMix) were mixed with real fresh human urine in order to enhance struvite precipitation. The supernatant of each mixture was tested as a feedstock for the MFCs and it was evaluated in terms of power output and catholyte generation. The commercial SeaMix showed the best performance in terms of struvite precipitation, increasing the amount of struvite in the solid collected from 21% to 94%. Moreover, the SeaMix increased the maximum power performance of the MFCs by over 10% and it also changed the properties of the catholyte collected by increasing the pH, conductivity and the concentration of chloride ions. These results demonstrate that the addition of sea-salts to real urine is beneficial for both struvite recovery and electricity generation in MFCs.Entities:
Keywords: Catholyte generation; Ceramic membrane; Microbial fuel cell (MFC); Struvite recovery; Urine treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27866103 PMCID: PMC5234473 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Water Res ISSN: 0043-1354 Impact factor: 11.236
Fig. 1Photo showing the six terracotta cylindrical MFCs.
Fig. 4Temporal power performance from the loaded MFCs, under the different feeding conditions.
Fig. 2SEM pictures of the struvite crystals obtained from the different precipitation methods: a) urine with no pre-treatment, b) urine + MgCl2, c) urine + sea water, d) urine + SeaMix.
Fig. 3XRD of the struvite obtained from different feedstocks in comparison with the Struvite (reference: 96-900-7675) and Struvite-K (reference: 96-901-0848) patterns.
Properties of the different feedstocks, precipitate obtained from the mixture, struvite recovered; together with the maximum power generated per individual MFC, the internal resistance and the properties of the catholyte collected.
| Feedstock | Amount of solids collected/g | Struvite present in the solids/% | Maximum Power according to polarisation/μW | Feedstock pH | Feedstock Conductivity/mS s−1 | Catholyte collected/ml day−1 | Catholyte pH | Catholyte Conductivity/mS s−1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCV | Loaded | OCV | Loaded | OCV | Loaded | |||||||
| Control U1 | 2 | 21 | 1764 ± 78 | 40.73 | 9.2 | 23.2 | 1.19 | 3.6 | 9.295 | 10.41 | 21.3 | 20.73 |
| Urine + MgCl2 | 4.9 | 80 | 1756 ± 115 | 40.37 | 9.2 | 28.6 | 0.52 | 3.38 | 9.175 | 10.36 | 21.8 | 22.1 |
| Control U2 | 1966 ± 156 | 40.75 | 9.28 | 31.8 | 0.71 | 3.04 | 9.15 | 10.45 | 23.5 | 24.5 | ||
| Urine Stirred | 1799 ± 99 | 40.7 | 9 | 30.5 | 0.55 | 2.8 | 9.18 | 10.15 | 23.6 | 25 | ||
| Control U3 | 1769 ± 167 | 40.75 | 9.23 | 31 | 0.53 | 2.4 | 9.20 | 10.12 | 23.6 | 26 | ||
| Urine + SeaWater | 4.75 | 73 | 1394 ± 99 | 48.35 | 9.25 | 43.6 | 0.14 | 3.09 | 8.89 | 10.44 | 23.1 | 26.36 |
| Control U4 | 1830 ± 237 | 40.72 | 9.25 | 28.7 | 0.357 | 2.5 | 9.05 | 10.65 | 26.2 | 27.86 | ||
| Urine + SeaMix | 5.1 | 94 | 2055 ± 268 | 34.14 | 9.25 | 43.6 | 0.41 | 1.57 | 9.42 | 10.62 | 36.3 | |
| Control U5 | 2089 ± 300 | 34.14 | 9.22 | 30 | 0.64 | 1.35 | 8.95 | 10.21 | 31.9 | 37.46 | ||
| Urine + DI water | 1316 ± 150 | 48.35 | 9 | 21.2 | 0.328 | 2.12 | 8.88 | 9 | 27.5 | 31.3 | ||
Fig. 5Chloride, phosphate and sulphate anion concentrations of the catholyte collected from the MFCs when fed with different inlets.