Literature DB >> 27865945

Episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ninna S Lund1, Lisa K G Persson2, Hanna Jangö3, Ditte Gommesen4, Hanne B Westergaard5.   

Abstract

The risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) is increased in vacuum-assisted delivery. However, it remains unclear whether episiotomy may protect against OASIS in this type of delivery. The objective of this study was to assess whether mediolateral or lateral episiotomy affects the risk of OASIS in vacuum-assisted delivery among primiparous women. Data were found searching The PubMed, Cochrane library and Embase databases electronically. Studies investigating the risk of OASIS in vacuum-assisted delivery with and without the use of mediolateral or lateral episiotomy were considered for inclusion. Of the 452 studies found, 15 observational studies were included in this meta-analysis. All authors assessed risk of bias of the included studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) quality score. According to this meta-analysis, mediolateral or lateral episiotomy significantly reduced the risk of OASIS in vacuum-assisted deliveries in primiparous women (OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.37-0.77)). Numbers needed to treat (NNT) was 18.3 (95% CI 17.7-18.9). The protective effect of episiotomy seemed most pronounced when performed in more than 75% of vacuum-assisted deliveries (OR 0.37 (95% CI 0.15-0.92)). In conclusion, this meta-analysis showed that mediolateral or lateral episiotomy was protective against OASIS and may be considered in vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women. Randomized controlled trials to further investigate this finding are warranted.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episiotomy; Meta-analysis; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Operative vaginal delivery; Vacuum extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27865945     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  12 in total

1.  The impact of third- or fourth-degree perineal tears on the second pregnancy: A cohort study of 182,445 Scottish women.

Authors:  Andrea Mary Woolner; Dolapo Ayansina; Mairead Black; Sohinee Bhattacharya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sandra Bergendahl; Victoria Ankarcrona; Åsa Leijonhufvud; Susanne Hesselman; Sofie Karlström; Helena Kopp Kallner; Sophia Brismar Wendel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Evidence-based intrapartum practice and its associated factors at a tertiary teaching hospital in the Philippines, a descriptive mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Chisato Masuda; Shirley Kristine Ferolin; Ken Masuda; Chris Smith; Mitsuaki Matsui
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Understanding the perspectives and values of midwives, obstetricians and obstetric registrars regarding episiotomy: qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Anna Seijmonsbergen-Schermers; Suzanne Thompson; Esther Feijen-de Jong; Marrit Smit; Marianne Prins; Thomas van den Akker; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Midline and Mediolateral Episiotomy: Risk Assessment Based on Clinical Anatomy.

Authors:  Danielle K Garner; Akash B Patel; Jun Hung; Monica Castro; Tamar G Segev; Jeffrey H Plochocki; Margaret I Hall
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-02

6.  Women's experiences of receiving information about and consenting or declining to participate in a randomized controlled trial involving episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jenny Ericson; Cecilia Anagrius; Agnes Rygaard; Lisa Guntram; Sophia Brismar Wendel; Susanne Hesselman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  French guidelines for restrictive episiotomy during instrumental delivery were not followed by an increase in obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Bertrand Gachon; Xavier Fritel; Olivier Rivière; Bruno Pereira; Françoise Vendittelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  How to reduce the potential risk of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Andrea Carosso; Stefano Cosma; Paola Serafini; Chiara Benedetto; Tahir Mahmood
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Can the cervical length in mid-trimester predict the use of vacuum in vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Jee Yoon Park; Sun Min Kim; Jeenah Sohn; Sejin Kim; Eunjin Song; Byoung Jae Kim; Hye Won Jeon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-12-26

10.  Mediolateral episiotomy and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries and adverse neonatal outcomes during operative vaginal delivery in nulliparous women: a propensity-score analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Desplanches; Laetitia Marchand-Martin; Emilie-Denise Szczepanski; Marie Ruillier; Jonathan Cottenet; Denis Semama; Emmanuel Simon; Catherine Quantin; Paul Sagot
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.