Literature DB >> 27865857

Evaluation of dissolution profile similarity - Comparison between the f2, the multivariate statistical distance and the f2 bootstrapping methods.

Paulo Paixão1, Luís F Gouveia2, Nuno Silva2, José A G Morais2.   

Abstract

A simulation study is presented, evaluating the performance of the f2, the model-independent multivariate statistical distance and the f2 bootstrap methods in the ability to conclude similarity between two dissolution profiles. Different dissolution profiles, based on the Noyes-Whitney equation and ranging from theoretical f2 values between 100 and 40, were simulated. Variability was introduced in the dissolution model parameters in an increasing order, ranging from a situation complying with the European guidelines requirements for the use of the f2 metric to several situations where the f2 metric could not be used anymore. Results have shown that the f2 is an acceptable metric when used according to the regulatory requirements, but loses its applicability when variability increases. The multivariate statistical distance presented contradictory results in several of the simulation scenarios, which makes it an unreliable metric for dissolution profile comparisons. The bootstrap f2, although conservative in its conclusions is an alternative suitable method. Overall, as variability increases, all of the discussed methods reveal problems that can only be solved by increasing the number of dosage form units used in the comparison, which is usually not practical or feasible. Additionally, experimental corrective measures may be undertaken in order to reduce the overall variability, particularly when it is shown that it is mainly due to the dissolution assessment instead of being intrinsic to the dosage form.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Keywords:  Bootstrap f(2) method; Model-independent multivariate statistical distance; Regulatory acceptance of dissolution similarity; Similarity of dissolution profiles; Variability in dissolution profiles; f(2) metric

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27865857     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm        ISSN: 0939-6411            Impact factor:   5.571


  5 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Discriminatory Dissolution Model for an Immediately Release Dosage Form by DOE and Statistical Approaches.

Authors:  Mingkun Fu; Ellen Conroy; Michael Byers; Lakshminarasimhan Pranatharthiharan; Thierry Bilbault
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  A Simple Approach for Comparing the In Vitro Dissolution Profiles of Highly Variable Drug Products: a Proposal.

Authors:  Marilyn N Martinez; Xiongce Zhao
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Modeling of In Vitro Dissolution Profiles of Carvedilol Immediate-Release Tablets in Different Dissolution Media.

Authors:  Duygu Yilmaz Usta; Tuba Incecayir
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.026

4.  Effect of solvents and cellulosic polymers on quality attributes of films loaded with a poorly water-soluble drug.

Authors:  Eylul Cetindag; John Pentangelo; Thierry Arrieta Cespedes; Rajesh N Davé
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 9.381

Review 5.  In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing.

Authors:  Moawia M Al-Tabakha; Muaed J Alomar
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 6.321

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.