Literature DB >> 27865776

Post-cardiac arrest shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An observational study and propensity-score analysis.

Wulfran Bougouin1, Nadia Aissaoui2, Alain Combes3, Nicolas Deye4, Lionel Lamhaut5, Daniel Jost6, Carole Maupain7, Frankie Beganton8, Adrien Bouglé9, Nicole Karam1, Florence Dumas10, Eloi Marijon1, Xavier Jouven1, Alain Cariou11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cardiogenic shock due to post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction is a major cause of mortality among patients hospitalized after cardiac arrest (CA). Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been proposed in the most severe cases but the level of evidence is very low. We assessed characteristics, outcome and prognostic factors of patients treated with VA-ECMO for post-CA shock.
METHODS: Using a large regional registry, we focused on all CA admitted in ICU. Among those who developed a post-CA shock, prognostic was compared according to VA-ECMO use, using logistic regression and propensity score. Specific prognostic factors were identified among VA-ECMO patients.
RESULTS: Among 2988 patients admitted after CA, 1489 developed a post-CA shock, and were included. They were mostly male (68%), with mean age 63 years (SD=15). Fiflty-two patients (3.5%) were treated with VA-ECMO, mostly patients with ischemic cause of CA (67%). Among patients with post-CA shock, 312 (21%) were discharged alive (25% in VA-ECMO group, 21% in control group, P=0.45). After adjustment for pre-hospital and in-hospital factors, survival did not differ among patients treated with VA-ECMO (OR for survival=0.9, 95%CI 0.4-2.3, P=0.84). After propensity-score matching, results were consistent. Among patients treated with VA-ECMO, initial arterial pH (OR=1.7 per 0.1 increase, 95%CI 1.0-2.8, P=0.04) and implantation of VA-ECMO over 24h after ROSC (OR=20.0, 95%CI 1.4-277.3, P=0.03) were associated with survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Post-CA shock is frequent and is associated with a high mortality rate. When used in selected patients, we observed that VA-ECMO could be an appropriate treatment.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrest; Extracorporeal life support; Shock

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27865776     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  10 in total

1.  Prevalence, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Cardiorespiratory Arrest in the Intensive Care Unit: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Antônio da Silva Menezes; Angélica L Braga; Viviane de Souza Cruvinel
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-06

2.  A Simple Scoring System to Predict Survival after Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Berhane Worku; Sandi Khin; Mario Gaudino; Dimitrios Avgerinos; Ivan Gambardella; Marcus D'Ayala; Kumudha Ramasubbu; Iosif Gulkarov; Arash Salemi
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  Diagnostic workup, etiologies and management of acute right ventricle failure : A state-of-the-art paper.

Authors:  Antoine Vieillard-Baron; R Naeije; F Haddad; H J Bogaard; T M Bull; N Fletcher; T Lahm; S Magder; S Orde; G Schmidt; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Validation of the CREST score for predicting circulatory-aetiology death in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without STEMI.

Authors:  Timothy N Jones; Matthew Kelham; Krishnaraj S Rathod; Charles J Knight; Alastair Proudfoot; Ajay K Jain; Andrew Wragg; Muhiddin Ozkor; Paul Rees; Oliver Guttmann; Andreas Baumbach; Anthony Mathur; Daniel A Jones
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-12-15

Review 5.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and the Critical Cardiac Patient.

Authors:  David A Baran
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2017-07-10

Review 6.  Post-resuscitation shock: recent advances in pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; Wulfran Bougouin; Guillaume Geri; David Grimaldi; Alain Cariou
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  Association Between the Acidemia, Lactic Acidosis, and Shock Severity With Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Jacob C Jentzer; Benedikt Schrage; Parag C Patel; Kianoush B Kashani; Gregory W Barsness; David R Holmes; Stefan Blankenberg; Paulus Kirchhof; Dirk Westermann
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.106

8.  Initial pH and shockable rhythm are associated with favorable neurological outcome in cardiac arrest patients resuscitated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Oussama Daou; Hadrien Winiszewski; Guillaume Besch; Sebastien Pili-Floury; François Belon; Benoit Guillon; Tania Marx; Sidney Chocron; Gilles Capellier; Andrea Perrotti; Gaël Piton
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.005

9.  Comparison of mechanical circulatory support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella for patients with cardiogenic shock: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Karatolios; Georgios Chatzis; Birgit Markus; Ulrich Luesebrink; Holger Ahrens; Dimitar Divchev; Styliani Syntila; Andreas Jerrentrup; Bernhard Schieffer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Understanding the "extracorporeal membrane oxygenation gap" in veno-arterial configuration for adult patients: Timing and causes of death.

Authors:  Maged Makhoul; Samuel Heuts; Abdulrahman Mansouri; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Amir Obeid; Belliato Mirko; Lars Mikael Broman; Maximilian Valentin Malfertheiner; Paolo Meani; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Thijs Delnoij; Jos Maessen; Gil Bolotin; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.094

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.