Literature DB >> 27865584

Cooperation and deception in primates.

Katie Hall1, Sarah F Brosnan2.   

Abstract

Though competition and cooperation are often considered opposing forces in an arms race driving natural selection, many animals, including humans, cooperate in order to mitigate competition with others. Understanding others' psychological states, such as seeing and knowing, others' goals and intentions, and coordinating actions are all important for complex cooperation-as well as for predicting behavior in order to take advantage of others through tactical deception, a form of competition. We outline evidence of primates' understanding of how others perceive the world, and then consider how the evidence from both deception and cooperation fits this framework to give us a more complete understanding of the evolution of complex social cognition in primates. In experimental food competitions, primates flexibly manipulate group-mates' behavior to tactically deceive them. Deception can infiltrate cooperative interactions, such as when one takes an unfair share of meat after a coordinated hunt. In order to counter competition of this sort, primates maintain cooperation through partner choice, partner control, and third party punishment. Yet humans appear to stand alone in their ability to understand others' beliefs, which allows us not only to deceive others with the explicit intent to create a false belief, but it also allows us to put ourselves in others' shoes to determine when cheaters need to be punished, even if we are not directly disadvantaged by the cheater.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cooperation; Partner choice; Partner control; Tactical deception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27865584     DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infant Behav Dev        ISSN: 0163-6383


  7 in total

Review 1.  Culture, morality and individual differences: comparability and incomparability across species.

Authors:  Gerard Saucier
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) tolerate some degree of inequity while cooperating but refuse to donate effort for nothing.

Authors:  Matthew W Campbell; Julia Watzek; Malini Suchak; Sarah M Berman; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 3.  The storytelling arms race: origin of human intelligence and the scientific mind.

Authors:  Enrico Coen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Experts in action: why we need an embodied social brain hypothesis.

Authors:  Louise Barrett; S Peter Henzi; Robert A Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Watching eyes do not stop dogs stealing food: evidence against a general risk-aversion hypothesis for the watching-eye effect.

Authors:  Patrick Neilands; Rebecca Hassall; Frederique Derks; Amalia P M Bastos; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Speech timing cues reveal deceptive speech in social deduction board games.

Authors:  Ziyun Zhang; Carolyn McGettigan; Michel Belyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Misrepresentation of group contributions undermines conditional cooperation in a human decision making experiment.

Authors:  Pieter van den Berg; Siyuan Liu; Tom Wenseleers; Jianlei Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.