Literature DB >> 27865479

Evaluation of knee functional calibration with and without the effect of soft tissue artefact.

Morgan Sangeux1, Arnaud Barré2, Kamiar Aminian3.   

Abstract

Functional calibration methods were devised to improve repeatability and accuracy of the knee flexion-extension axis, which is used to define the medio-lateral axis of the femur coordinate system in gait analysis. Repeatability of functional calibration methods has been studied extensively in healthy individuals, but not accuracy in the absence of a benchmark knee axis. We captured bi-plane fluoroscopy data of the knee joint in 17 subjects with unilateral total knee arthroplasty during treadmill walking. The prosthesis provided a benchmark knee axis to evaluate the functional calibration methods. Stereo-photogrammetry data of thigh and shank marker clusters were captured simultaneously to investigate the effect of soft tissue artefact (STA). Three methods were tested, the Axis Transformation Technique (ATT) finds the best single fixed axis of rotation, 2DofKnee finds the axis that minimises knee varus-valgus and trajAJC finds the axis perpendicular to the trajectory, in the transverse plane of the femur, of a point located on the longitudinal axis of the tibia. Using fluoroscopy data, functional axes formed an angle of less than 2° in the transverse plane with the benchmark axis. True internal-external range of movement was correlated with decreased accuracy for ATT, while varus-valgus range of movement was correlated with decreased accuracy for 2DofKnee and trajAJC. STA had negative impact on accuracy and variability. Using stereo-photogrammetry data, the accuracy of 2DofKnee was 1.7°(SD: 5.1°), smaller than ATT 2.9°(SD: 5.1°) but not to trajAJC 1.7°(SD: 5.2°). Our results confirm that of previous studies, which utilised the femur condylar axis as reference.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional calibration; Knee; Soft tissue artefact; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27865479     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  2 in total

1.  The impact of thigh and shank marker quantity on lower extremity kinematics using a constrained model.

Authors:  Annelise A Slater; Todd J Hullfish; Josh R Baxter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  The Conventional Gait Model's sensitivity to lower-limb marker placement.

Authors:  M Fonseca; M Bergere; J Candido; F Leboeuf; R Dumas; S Armand
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.