Marjorie Icenogle1, Sasha Eastburn2, Martha Arrieta3. 1. Department of Management, Mitchell College of Business, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama. 2. Research Office, Center for Healthy Communities, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama. 3. Research Office, Center for Healthy Communities, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama. Electronic address: marrieta@southalabama.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ensuring continuity of care for patients with chronic illness, who are elderly or indigent presents unique challenges after disasters; this population has fewer financial resources, is less likely to evacuate, has limited access to recovery resources and is significantly dependent on charitable and government-funded institutions for care. This study expands a previous investigation of the extent to which healthcare providers in coastal Mississippi and Alabama have made changes to facilitate continued care to these populations after disasters. METHODS: Key informants representing healthcare and social services organizations serving health-disparate residents of the Mississippi and Alabama Gulf Coast were interviewed regarding disaster preparation planning for the period of 2009-2012. Interview transcripts were qualitatively coded and analyzed for emerging themes using ATLAS.ti software. RESULTS: Participant organizations have implemented changes to ensure continuity of care for patients with chronic illness in case of disasters. Changes include patient assistance with predisaster preparation and training; evacuation planning and assistance; support to find resources in evacuation destinations; equipping patients with prescription information, diagnoses, treatment plans and advance medications when a disaster is imminent; multiple methods for patients to communicate with providers and more mandated medical needs shelters. Patients whose chronic conditions were diagnosed post-Katrina are more likely to underestimate the need to prepare. Further, patients' lack of compliance tends to increase as time passes from disasters. CONCLUSIONS: Although changes were implemented, results indicate that these may be inadequate to completely address patient needs. Thus, additional efforts may be needed, underscoring the complexity of adequate disaster preparation among disparate populations.
BACKGROUND: Ensuring continuity of care for patients with chronic illness, who are elderly or indigent presents unique challenges after disasters; this population has fewer financial resources, is less likely to evacuate, has limited access to recovery resources and is significantly dependent on charitable and government-funded institutions for care. This study expands a previous investigation of the extent to which healthcare providers in coastal Mississippi and Alabama have made changes to facilitate continued care to these populations after disasters. METHODS: Key informants representing healthcare and social services organizations serving health-disparate residents of the Mississippi and Alabama Gulf Coast were interviewed regarding disaster preparation planning for the period of 2009-2012. Interview transcripts were qualitatively coded and analyzed for emerging themes using ATLAS.ti software. RESULTS:Participant organizations have implemented changes to ensure continuity of care for patients with chronic illness in case of disasters. Changes include patient assistance with predisaster preparation and training; evacuation planning and assistance; support to find resources in evacuation destinations; equipping patients with prescription information, diagnoses, treatment plans and advance medications when a disaster is imminent; multiple methods for patients to communicate with providers and more mandated medical needs shelters. Patients whose chronic conditions were diagnosed post-Katrina are more likely to underestimate the need to prepare. Further, patients' lack of compliance tends to increase as time passes from disasters. CONCLUSIONS: Although changes were implemented, results indicate that these may be inadequate to completely address patient needs. Thus, additional efforts may be needed, underscoring the complexity of adequate disaster preparation among disparate populations.
Authors: Mollyann Brodie; Erin Weltzien; Drew Altman; Robert J Blendon; John M Benson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-03-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Anne Lang Dunlop; Alexander P Isakov; Michael T Compton; Melissa White; Hogai Nassery; Erica Frank; Karen Glanz Journal: Am J Disaster Med Date: 2007 May-Jun
Authors: David P Eisenman; Qiong Zhou; Michael Ong; Steven Asch; Deborah Glik; Anna Long Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Belinda M Reininger; Mohammad H Rahbar; Minjae Lee; Zhongxue Chen; Sartaj R Alam; Jennifer Pope; Barbara Adams Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 4.634