Literature DB >> 27864934

Recovery of Trace DNA on Clothing: A Comparison of Mini-tape Lifting and Three Other Forensic Evidence Collection Techniques.

Sabine Hess1, Cordula Haas2.   

Abstract

Trace DNA is often found in forensic science investigations. Experience has shown that it is difficult to retrieve a DNA profile when trace DNA is collected from clothing. The aim of this study was to compare four different DNA collection techniques on six different types of clothing in order to determine the best trace DNA recovery method. The classical stain recovery technique using a wet cotton swab was tested against dry swabbing, scraping and a new method, referred to as the mini-tape lifting technique. Physical contact was simulated with three different "perpetrators" on 18 machine-washed garments. DNA was collected with the four different DNA recovery methods and subjected to standard PCR-based DNA profiling. The comparison of STR results showed best results for the mini-tape lifting and scraping methods independent of the type of clothing. The new mini-tape lifting technique proved to be an easy and reliable DNA collection method for textiles.
© 2016 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

Keywords:  DNA analysis; DNA collection technique; contact stains; crime scene investigation; forensic science; mini-tapes; touch DNA; trace DNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27864934     DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  5 in total

Review 1.  Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2016-2019.

Authors:  Andy Bécue; Heidi Eldridge; Christophe Champod
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: An experimental study.

Authors:  Francesco Sessa; Monica Salerno; Giuseppe Bertozzi; Giovanni Messina; Pietrantonio Ricci; Caterina Ledda; Venerando Rapisarda; Santina Cantatore; Emanuela Turillazzi; Cristoforo Pomara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comparison of the M-Vac® Wet-Vacuum-Based Collection Method to a Wet-Swabbing Method for DNA Recovery on Diluted Bloodstained Substrates*,, ‡.

Authors:  Jessica M McLamb; Lara D Adams; Mark F Kavlick
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 4.  DNA Transfer in Forensic Science: Recent Progress towards Meeting Challenges.

Authors:  Roland A H van Oorschot; Georgina E Meakin; Bas Kokshoorn; Mariya Goray; Bianca Szkuta
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  One-click device for rapid visualization and extraction of latent evidence through multi-moding light source integration and light-guiding technology.

Authors:  Nengbin Cai; Wenbin Liu; Xuejun Zhao; Xiaochun Huang; Fei Gao; Changliang Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.