Literature DB >> 27864889

Goal-Directed Treatment for Osteoporosis: A Progress Report From the ASBMR-NOF Working Group on Goal-Directed Treatment for Osteoporosis.

Steven R Cummings1, Felicia Cosman2, E Michael Lewiecki3, John T Schousboe4, Douglas C Bauer5, Dennis M Black6, Thomas D Brown7, Angela M Cheung8, Kathleen Cody9, Cyrus Cooper10, Adolfo Diez-Perez11, Richard Eastell12, Peyman Hadji13, Takayuki Hosoi14, Suzanne Jan De Beur15, Risa Kagan16, Douglas P Kiel17, Ian R Reid18, Daniel H Solomon19, Susan Randall20.   

Abstract

The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research and the United States National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) formed a working group to develop principles of goal-directed treatment and identify gaps that need to be filled to implement this approach. With goal-directed treatment, a treatment goal would first be established and choice of treatment determined by the probability of achieving that goal. Goals of treatment would be freedom from fracture, a T-score > -2.5, which is above the NOF threshold for initiating treatment, or achievement of an estimated risk level below the threshold for initiating treatment. Progress toward reaching the patient's goal would be periodically and systematically assessed by estimating the patient's compliance with treatment, reviewing fracture history, repeating vertebral imaging when indicated, and repeating measurement of bone mineral density (BMD). Using these data, a decision would be made to stop, continue, or change therapy. Some of these approaches can now be applied to clinical practice. However, the application of goal-directed treatment cannot be fully achieved until medications are available that provide greater increases in BMD and greater reduction in fracture risk than those that are currently approved; only then can patients with very high fracture risk and very low BMD achieve such goals. Furthermore, assessing future fracture risk in patients on treatment requires a new assessment tool that accurately captures the change in fracture risk associated with treatment and should also be sensitive to the importance of recent fractures as predictors of imminent fracture risk. Lastly, evidence is needed to confirm that selecting and switching treatments to achieve goals reduces fracture risk more effectively than current standard care.
© 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GOAL; OSTEOPOROSIS; TARGET; TREAT-TO-GOAL; TREAT-TO-TARGET; TREATMENT

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27864889     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  40 in total

1.  Combination therapy with parathyroid hormone analogs and antiresorptive agents for osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  S Lou; H Lv; P Yin; Z Li; P Tang; Y Wang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Significant improvement of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers by denosumab therapy in bisphosphonate-unresponsive patients: response to comments.

Authors:  M Kamimura; Y Nakamura; S Ikegami; S Uchiyama; H Kato; A Taguchi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Using Osteoporosis Therapies in Combination.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs.

Authors:  Willem F Lems; Hennie G Raterman
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 5.  Osteoporosis: Treat-to-Target.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Effect of denosumab administration on low bone mineral density (T-score -1.0 to -2.5) in postmenopausal Japanese women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for non-metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Nakatsukasa; Hiroshi Koyama; Yoshimi Ouchi; Kouichi Sakaguchi; Yoshifumi Fujita; Takayuki Matsuda; Makoto Kato; Eiichi Konishi; Tetsuya Taguchi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  RANKL as a target for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Toshio Matsumoto; Itsuro Endo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  High bisphosphonate treatment rates and the prevalence of atypical femoral fractures in patients with systematic lupus erythematosus: a single-center retrospective study performed in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroe Sato; Naoki Kondo; Ayako Wakamatsu; Daisuke Kobayashi; Takeshi Nakatsue; Yoko Wada; Takeshi Kuroda; Yoshiki Suzuki; Masaaki Nakano; Naoto Endo; Ichiei Narita
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 9.  New and emerging concepts in the use of denosumab for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.346

10.  Effect of continuous long-term treatment for 10 years with bisphosphonate on Japanese osteoporosis patients.

Authors:  Kousuke Iba; Junichi Takada; Tomoko Sonoda; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.