S J L Mesnage1, A Auguste1,2, C Genestie1,3, A Dunant4, E Pain1, F Drusch5, S Gouy6, P Morice6, E Bentivegna6, C Lhomme7, P Pautier7, J Michels7, A Le Formal1,2, B Cheaib7, J Adam1,3, A F Leary1,2,7. 1. INSERM U981 Gynaecological Tumours, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif. 2. Faculty of Sciences, University Paris-Sud, Orsay. 3. Departments of Biopathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. 5. Translational Research and Histocytopathology Laboratory, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue E Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France. 6. Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Department of Gynecologic Surgery, F-94805, Villejuif, France. 7. Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France.
Abstract
Background: Lymphocytic infiltration at diagnosis is prognostic in EOC, however, the impact of NACT on tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or PD-L1 expression remains poorly described. Patients and methods: Patients with EOC and sequential samples (pre-NACT, post-NACT or relapse) were retrospectively identified. TILs were evaluated on whole sections; stromal TILs (sTILs) scored as percentage of stromal area with high sTILs defined as ≥50%; intra-epithelial TILs (ieTILs) scored semi-quantitatively (0-3) with high ieTILs ≥2. A smaller number were available for PD-L1 evaluation, cut-off for positivity was ≥5% staining. Results: sTILs were detected in all tumours at diagnosis (range 2-90%, median 20%), with 22% (25/113) showing high sTILs. Among evaluable paired pre/post-NACT samples (N = 83), an overall increase in median sTILs from 20% to 30% was seen following NACT (P = 0.0005); individually the impact of NACT varied with sTILs increasing in 51% (42/83), decreasing in 25%, and stable in 24%. Post-NACT sTILs were predictive of platinum-free interval (PFI), patients with PFI ≥6 months had significantly higher post-NACT sTILs (sTILs 28% versus 18% for PFI <6 months, P = 0.026); pre-NACT sTILS were not predictive. At diagnosis, 23% showed high ieTILs, and following NACT 33% showed increasing ieTILs. Proportion of tumours with PD-L1-positive immune cells was 30% (15/50) pre-NACT and 53% (27/51) post-NACT (P = 0.026). Among paired tumours, 63% of PD-L1-negative tumours became positive after NACT, furthermore cisplatin induced PD-L1 expression in PD-L1-negative EOC cell lines. On multivariate analysis, high sTILs both pre- and post-NACT were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.49, P = 0.02 and HR 0.60, P = 0.05, respectively). No prognostic impact of ieTILs or PD-L1 expression was detected. Conclusions: In EOC, sTILs levels are prognostic at diagnosis and remain prognostic after NACT. TILs and PD-L1 expression increase following NACT. Evaluation of immune parameters in the post-NACT tumour may help select patients for immunotherapy trials.
Background: Lymphocytic infiltration at diagnosis is prognostic in EOC, however, the impact of NACT on tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or PD-L1 expression remains poorly described. Patients and methods: Patients with EOC and sequential samples (pre-NACT, post-NACT or relapse) were retrospectively identified. TILs were evaluated on whole sections; stromal TILs (sTILs) scored as percentage of stromal area with high sTILs defined as ≥50%; intra-epithelial TILs (ieTILs) scored semi-quantitatively (0-3) with high ieTILs ≥2. A smaller number were available for PD-L1 evaluation, cut-off for positivity was ≥5% staining. Results:sTILs were detected in all tumours at diagnosis (range 2-90%, median 20%), with 22% (25/113) showing high sTILs. Among evaluable paired pre/post-NACT samples (N = 83), an overall increase in median sTILs from 20% to 30% was seen following NACT (P = 0.0005); individually the impact of NACT varied with sTILs increasing in 51% (42/83), decreasing in 25%, and stable in 24%. Post-NACTsTILs were predictive of platinum-free interval (PFI), patients with PFI ≥6 months had significantly higher post-NACTsTILs (sTILs 28% versus 18% for PFI <6 months, P = 0.026); pre-NACTsTILS were not predictive. At diagnosis, 23% showed high ieTILs, and following NACT 33% showed increasing ieTILs. Proportion of tumours with PD-L1-positive immune cells was 30% (15/50) pre-NACT and 53% (27/51) post-NACT (P = 0.026). Among paired tumours, 63% of PD-L1-negative tumours became positive after NACT, furthermore cisplatin induced PD-L1 expression in PD-L1-negative EOC cell lines. On multivariate analysis, high sTILs both pre- and post-NACT were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.49, P = 0.02 and HR 0.60, P = 0.05, respectively). No prognostic impact of ieTILs or PD-L1 expression was detected. Conclusions: In EOC, sTILs levels are prognostic at diagnosis and remain prognostic after NACT. TILs and PD-L1 expression increase following NACT. Evaluation of immune parameters in the post-NACTtumour may help select patients for immunotherapy trials.
Authors: Shona Hendry; Roberto Salgado; Thomas Gevaert; Prudence A Russell; Tom John; Bibhusal Thapa; Michael Christie; Koen van de Vijver; M V Estrada; Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson; Melinda Sanders; Benjamin Solomon; Cinzia Solinas; Gert G G M Van den Eynden; Yves Allory; Matthias Preusser; Johannes Hainfellner; Giancarlo Pruneri; Andrea Vingiani; Sandra Demaria; Fraser Symmans; Paolo Nuciforo; Laura Comerma; E A Thompson; Sunil Lakhani; Seong-Rim Kim; Stuart Schnitt; Cecile Colpaert; Christos Sotiriou; Stefan J Scherer; Michail Ignatiadis; Sunil Badve; Robert H Pierce; Giuseppe Viale; Nicolas Sirtaine; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Tomohagu Sugie; Susan Fineberg; Soonmyung Paik; Ashok Srinivasan; Andrea Richardson; Yihong Wang; Ewa Chmielik; Jane Brock; Douglas B Johnson; Justin Balko; Stephan Wienert; Veerle Bossuyt; Stefan Michiels; Nils Ternes; Nicole Burchardi; Stephen J Luen; Peter Savas; Frederick Klauschen; Peter H Watson; Brad H Nelson; Carmen Criscitiello; Sandra O'Toole; Denis Larsimont; Roland de Wind; Giuseppe Curigliano; Fabrice André; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Mark van de Vijver; Federico Rojo; Giuseppe Floris; Shahinaz Bedri; Joseph Sparano; David Rimm; Torsten Nielsen; Zuzana Kos; Stephen Hewitt; Baljit Singh; Gelareh Farshid; Sibylle Loibl; Kimberly H Allison; Nadine Tung; Sylvia Adams; Karen Willard-Gallo; Hugo M Horlings; Leena Gandhi; Andre Moreira; Fred Hirsch; Maria V Dieci; Maria Urbanowicz; Iva Brcic; Konstanty Korski; Fabien Gaire; Hartmut Koeppen; Amy Lo; Jennifer Giltnane; Marlon C Rebelatto; Keith E Steele; Jiping Zha; Kenneth Emancipator; Jonathan W Juco; Carsten Denkert; Jorge Reis-Filho; Sherene Loi; Stephen B Fox Journal: Adv Anat Pathol Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 3.875
Authors: Rebecca C Arend; Carly B Scalise; Emily R Gordon; Allison M Davis; McKenzie E Foxall; Bobbi E Johnston; David K Crossman; Sara J Cooper Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Ellen L Goode; Matthew S Block; Kimberly R Kalli; Robert A Vierkant; Wenqian Chen; Zachary C Fogarty; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Aleksandra Tołoczko; Alexander Hein; Aliecia L Bouligny; Allan Jensen; Ana Osorio; Andreas Hartkopf; Andy Ryan; Anita Chudecka-Głaz; Anthony M Magliocco; Arndt Hartmann; Audrey Y Jung; Bo Gao; Brenda Y Hernandez; Brooke L Fridley; Bryan M McCauley; Catherine J Kennedy; Chen Wang; Chloe Karpinskyj; Christiani B de Sousa; Daniel G Tiezzi; David L Wachter; Esther Herpel; Florin Andrei Taran; Francesmary Modugno; Gregg Nelson; Jan Lubiński; Janusz Menkiszak; Jennifer Alsop; Jenny Lester; Jesús García-Donas; Jill Nation; José Palacios; Joseph H Rothstein; Joseph L Kelley; Jurandyr M de Andrade; Luis Robles-Díaz; Maria P Intermaggio; Martin Widschwendter; Matthias W Beckmann; Matthias Ruebner; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Naveena Singh; Oleg Oszurek; Paul R Harnett; Peter F Rambau; Peter Sinn; Philipp Wagner; Prafull Ghatage; Raghwa Sharma; Robert P Edwards; Roberta B Ness; Sandra Orsulic; Sara Y Brucker; Sharon E Johnatty; Teri A Longacre; Eilber Ursula; Valerie McGuire; Weiva Sieh; Yanina Natanzon; Zheng Li; Alice S Whittemore; deFazio Anna; Annette Staebler; Beth Y Karlan; Blake Gilks; David D Bowtell; Estrid Høgdall; Francisco J Candido dos Reis; Helen Steed; Ian G Campbell; Jacek Gronwald; Javier Benítez; Jennifer M Koziak; Jenny Chang-Claude; Kirsten B Moysich; Linda E Kelemen; Linda S Cook; Marc T Goodman; María José García; Peter A Fasching; Stefan Kommoss; Suha Deen; Susanne K Kjaer; Usha Menon; James D Brenton; Paul DP Pharoah; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; David G Huntsman; Stacey J Winham; Martin Köbel; Susan J Ramus Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 33.006
Authors: Premal H Thaker; William H Bradley; Charles A Leath; Camille Gunderson Jackson; Nicholas Borys; Khursheed Anwer; Lauren Musso; Junko Matsuzaki; Wiam Bshara; Kunle Odunsi; Ronald D Alvarez Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 13.801