| Literature DB >> 27863903 |
Samuel Dean1, Jack D Sunter2, Richard J Wheeler3.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27863903 PMCID: PMC5270239 DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2016.10.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Parasitol ISSN: 1471-4922
Figure 1High-Throughput Protein Tagging Workflow. Schematic of the tagging workflow from automated primer design to data release routes.
Figure 2Example Localisations and Annotations from TryTag.org. Three example cell lines expressing proteins tagged at the N terminus with mNeonGreen (mNG) [9], and imaged along with phase contrast (phase) and Hoechst 33342, a fluorescent marker for DNA in the nucleus and kinetoplast (hoechst). Localisation annotations are assigned in the form localisation 1 [modifier 1, modifier 2, …], localisation 2 [modifier 1, …], …. Each localisation has a linked cellular component gene ontology (GO) term. For example, in the middle, Tb927.10.12850, tagged on its N-terminus by mNG, localises to the nucleoplasm (GO:0005654). However, it does not localise to the entire nucleoplasm, so its localisation is further defined by the modifier term ‘points’. Scale bar represents 10 μm.