Literature DB >> 27863769

Erratum to "Frequencies of polymorphisms of Rh, Kell, Kidd, Duffy and Diego systems of Santa Catarina, southern Brazil" [Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2016;38(3):199-205].

Daiane Cobianchi Costa1, Alessandra Arruda Schinaider1, Thais Mattos Santos1, Everaldo José Schörner2, Daniel Simon3, Sharbel Weidner Maluf1, Ana Carolina Rabello de Moraes1, Maria Claudia Silva Silva4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27863769      PMCID: PMC5119667          DOI: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2016.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter        ISSN: 1516-8484


× No keyword cloud information.
Please consider the following correction:

Results

Page 201 – “Statistical differences were observed in the comparison with Brazilian populations. The genotypes RHCE*Ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, FY*01/FY*01, JK*01/JK*01, and JK*02/02 were more prevalent in the population from the state of Santa Catarina in comparison with the state of São Paulo. In addition, RHCE*Cc, RHCE*cc, RHCE*ee, FY*01/FY*02, FY*01/FY*02.N01, FY*02/FY*02, FY*02/FY*02.N01, FY*02.N01/FY*02.N01, and JK*01/JK*02 genotypes were more common in the population from the state of São Paulo” should read as “Statistical differences were observed in the comparison with Brazilian populations. The genotypes RHCE*Ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, , JK*01/JK*01, and JK*02/02 were more prevalent in the population from the state of Santa Catarina in comparison with the state of São Paulo. In addition, RHCE*Cc, RHCE*cc, RHCE*ee, FY*01/FY*02.N01, FY*02/FY*02, FY*02/FY*02.N01, FY*02.N01/FY*02.N01, and JK*01/JK*02 genotypes were more common in the population from the state of São Paulo.” Page 201 – “When the data were compared with European populations, only the genotypes RHCE*Cc, RHCE*EE, RHCE*ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*01.1, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, KEL*02/KEL*02 JK*01/JK*01, and DI*01/DI*01 did not differ statistically (Table 4)” should read as “When the data were compared with European populations, only the genotypes RHCE*Cc, RHCE*EE, RHCE*ee, KEL*01.1/KEL*01.1, KEL*01.1/KEL*02, KEL*02/KEL*02, , JK*01/JK*01, and DI*01/DI*01 did not differ statistically (Table 4)”. Tables Table 1 should read as: Table 2 should read as: Table 3 should read as: Table 4 should read as:
SystemGenotypeFrequency (n(%))
373 donors31 patients
DuffyFY*01/FY*0157 (15.3)3 (9.7)
FY*01/FY*02176 (47.2)11 (35.5)
GenotypeJOAN33
Rh System
RHCE*Ee0.12 (4)
RHCE*ee0.82 (27)
RHCE*E0.12
RHCE*e0.88
GenotypeSCN373PRN400SP-POP1N948SP-POP2N250SP-POP3N308
Duffy System
FY*01/FY*010.15 (57)0.12 (50)0.12 (114)0.14 (34)0.12 (36)
FY*01/FY*020.47 (176)0.40 (157)*0.45 (426)0.27 (68)*0.34 (105)*
GenotypeSCN373Austria27N200Naples28N225Zurich29N4000
Duffy System
FY*01/FY*010.15 (57)0.20 (40)0.18 (40)0.18 (703)
FY*01/FY*020.47 (176)0.36 (72)*0.43 (98)0.47 (1862)
  1 in total

1.  Genetic variability of blood groups in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Gabriela Waskow; Mirelen Moura de Oliveira Rodrigues; Gabriela Höher; Tor Onsten; Juliana Dal-Ri Lindenau; Marilu Fiegenbaum; Silvana Almeida
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.771

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.