Literature DB >> 27862860

Incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation following treatment with the repositionable Lotus™ transcatheter aortic valve.

Sarah Zaman1,2, Liam McCormick1,2, Robert Gooley1,2, Hashrul Rashid1, Satish Ramkumar1, Damon Jackson1, Samuel Hui1, Ian T Meredith1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker (PPM) requirement following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the mechanically expanded LotusTM Valve System (Boston Scientific).
BACKGROUND: Pacemaker implantation is the most common complication following TAVR. Predictors of pacing following TAVR with the Lotus valve have not been systematically assessed.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent Lotus valve implantation were prospectively recruited at a single-centre. Patients with a pre-existing PPM were excluded. Baseline ECG, echocardiographic and multiple detector computed tomography as well as procedural telemetry and depth of implantation were independently analyzed in a blinded manner. The primary endpoint was 30-day incidence of pacemaker requirement (PPM implantation or death while pacing-dependent). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of the primary endpoint.
RESULTS: A total of 104 consecutive patients underwent TAVR with the Lotus valve with 9/104 (9%) with a pre-existing PPM excluded. New or worsened procedural LBBB occurred in 78%. Thirty-day incidence of the primary pacing endpoint was 28%. The most common indication for PPM implantation was complete heart block (CHB) (69%). Independent predictors of the primary endpoint included pre-existing RBBB (hazard ratio [HR] 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.0; P = 0.032) and depth of implantation below the noncoronary cusp (NCC) (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.0-5.7; P = 0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: Almost a third of Lotus valve recipients require pacemaker implantation within 30 days. The presence of pre-existing RBBB and the depth of prosthesis implantation below the NCC were significant pacing predictors.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve disease; electron beam CT/multidetector CT; imaging; percutaneous intervention; transcatheter valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27862860     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of transcatheter and sutureless aortic bioprostheses: how to make the right choice in intermediate risk patients.

Authors:  Augusto D'Onofrio; Assunta Fabozzo; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

2.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a mechanically expandable prosthesis: a learning experience for permanent pacemaker implantation rate reduction.

Authors:  Jasmin Ortak; Giuseppe D'Ancona; Hüseyin Ince; Hüseyin U Agma; Erdal Safak; Alper Öner; Stephan Kische
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 3.  Intraventricular Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Shu-I Lin; Mizuki Miura; Ana Paula Tagliari; Ying-Hsian Lee; Shinichi Shirai; Rishi Puri; Francesco Maisano; Maurizio Taramasso
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-29

Review 4.  Rate and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Current Status.

Authors:  Eleonora Russo; Domenico R Potenza; Michela Casella; Raimondo Massaro; Giulio Russo; Maurizio Braccio; Antonio Dello Russo; Mauro Cassese
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2019

5.  Prognostic Outcome of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jialu Wang; Shidong Liu; Xiangxiang Han; Yang Chen; Hao Chen; Zunhui Wan; Bing Song
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 6.  Impact of Complications During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: How Can They Be Avoided and Managed?

Authors:  Roberto Scarsini; Giovanni L De Maria; Jubin Joseph; Lampson Fan; Thomas J Cahill; Rafail A Kotronias; Francesco Burzotta; James D Newton; Rajesh Kharbanda; Bernard Prendergast; Flavio Ribichini; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.