BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized pilot trial to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a 5 week positive affect skills intervention (LILAC: lessons in linking affect and coping) for women with metastatic breast cancer. Additionally, we examined whether online delivery of the intervention would offer comparable benefits as in-person delivery. METHODS:Women with metastatic breast cancer (N = 39) were randomized to an in-person intervention, online intervention, or in-person attention-matched control. Psychological well-being (depression [Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale], positive and negative affect [Differential Emotions Scale], cancer-specific quality of life [Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale-Cancer Version]), and positive coping (mindfulness, positive-affect skill use, and self-compassion [Self-Compassion Scale: Short-Form]) were assessed at baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1 month post-intervention follow-up. RESULTS: The LILAC intervention showed good feasibility, acceptability, and retention. Although the study was not adequately powered to detect between-group differences in change on preliminary efficacy outcomes, within-group comparisons revealed that LILAC participants (in-person and online combined) showed reductions in depression and negative affect by the 1 month follow-up (d = -0.81). Notably, LILAC participants fell below the clinical threshold for depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale = 16) by the 1 month follow-up (t[17] = -2.22, P = .04, d = -0.52), whereas control participants did not differ from threshold (t[9] = 0.45, P = .66, d = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The LILAC intervention, regardless of delivery method, shows feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy for promoting psychological well-being in women with metastatic breast cancer. This research provides support for a larger randomized trial to test more definitively the potential benefits of LILAC. A strength of the LILAC intervention includes its innovative focus on positive affect. The efficacy of the online delivery suggests the potential for widespread Internet dissemination.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized pilot trial to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a 5 week positive affect skills intervention (LILAC: lessons in linking affect and coping) for women with metastatic breast cancer. Additionally, we examined whether online delivery of the intervention would offer comparable benefits as in-person delivery. METHODS:Women with metastatic breast cancer (N = 39) were randomized to an in-person intervention, online intervention, or in-person attention-matched control. Psychological well-being (depression [Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale], positive and negative affect [Differential Emotions Scale], cancer-specific quality of life [Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale-Cancer Version]), and positive coping (mindfulness, positive-affect skill use, and self-compassion [Self-Compassion Scale: Short-Form]) were assessed at baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 1 month post-intervention follow-up. RESULTS: The LILAC intervention showed good feasibility, acceptability, and retention. Although the study was not adequately powered to detect between-group differences in change on preliminary efficacy outcomes, within-group comparisons revealed that LILACparticipants (in-person and online combined) showed reductions in depression and negative affect by the 1 month follow-up (d = -0.81). Notably, LILACparticipants fell below the clinical threshold for depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale = 16) by the 1 month follow-up (t[17] = -2.22, P = .04, d = -0.52), whereas control participants did not differ from threshold (t[9] = 0.45, P = .66, d = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The LILAC intervention, regardless of delivery method, shows feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy for promoting psychological well-being in women with metastatic breast cancer. This research provides support for a larger randomized trial to test more definitively the potential benefits of LILAC. A strength of the LILAC intervention includes its innovative focus on positive affect. The efficacy of the online delivery suggests the potential for widespread Internet dissemination.
Authors: M H Antoni; J M Lehman; K M Kilbourn; A E Boyers; J L Culver; S M Alferi; S E Yount; B A McGregor; P L Arena; S D Harris; A A Price; C S Carver Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Judith T Moskowitz; Elaine O Cheung; Karin E Snowberg; Alice Verstaen; Jennifer Merrilees; John M Salsman; Glenna A Dowling Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Rebecca E Ready; Nicholas R Boileau; Stacey K Barton; Jin-Shei Lai; Michael K McCormack; David Cella; Nora E Fritz; Jane S Paulsen; Noelle E Carlozzi Journal: J Huntingtons Dis Date: 2019
Authors: Joep van Agteren; Matthew Iasiello; Laura Lo; Jonathan Bartholomaeus; Zoe Kopsaftis; Marissa Carey; Michael Kyrios Journal: Nat Hum Behav Date: 2021-04-19
Authors: John M Salsman; James E Pustejovsky; Stephen M Schueller; Rosalba Hernandez; Mark Berendsen; Laurie E Steffen McLouth; Judith T Moskowitz Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Judith T Moskowitz; Adam W Carrico; Larissa G Duncan; Michael A Cohn; Elaine O Cheung; Abigail Batchelder; Lizet Martinez; Eisuke Segawa; Michael Acree; Susan Folkman Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2017-03-23
Authors: Elizabeth L Addington; Elaine O Cheung; Sarah M Bassett; Ian Kwok; Stephanie A Schuette; Eva Shiu; Dershung Yang; Michael A Cohn; Yan Leykin; Laura R Saslow; Judith T Moskowitz Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Janelle M Painter; Jasmine Mote; Andrew D Peckham; Erica H Lee; Timothy R Campellone; Jennifer G Pearlstein; Stefana Morgan; Ann M Kring; Sheri L Johnson; Judith T Moskowitz Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: David Olem; Maya Earle; Walter Gómez; Lara Coffin; Paul Cotten; Jennifer P Jain; Judith T Moskowitz; Adam W Carrico Journal: Cogn Behav Pract Date: 2020-11-10
Authors: Margaret Krasne; Kathryn J Ruddy; Philip D Poorvu; Shari I Gelber; Rulla M Tamimi; Lidia Schapira; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Steven E Come; Virginia F Borges; Ann H Partridge; Shoshana M Rosenberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-08-20 Impact factor: 3.359