Literature DB >> 27862592

Retrograde continence enema in children with spina bifida: Not as effective as first thought.

Sebastian K King1,2,3, Lefteris Stathopoulos1, Loreto Pinnuck4, Judy Wells5, John Hutson2,3,6, Yves Heloury6.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of Peristeen retrograde continence enema (RCE) in the management of faecal incontinence in children with spina bifida.
METHODS: We identified a homogenous group of spina bifida patients in whom RCE was initiated (Jan 2006-July 2013). Confidential assessments included (i) Fecal Incontinence Quality Of Life (FIQOL), (ii) St Marks Faecal Incontinence score, (iii) Cleveland Clinic Constipation score and (iv) Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction score.
RESULTS: Of 20 patients, 11 (mean age 14.5 ± 5.3 years) were male. Of 20 patients, nine were still using RCE (mean follow-up 4.1 years). Three patients ceased RCE within 10 days, six after 4-12 months and two after 36-48 months. Reasons for cessation included balloon difficulties (n = 4), procedure deemed too difficult (n = 4) and pain (n = 3). There were no differences between the groups in length of training time for technique, instillate fluid/volume used and time taken to perform RCE. There were no differences between the groups for quality of life, faecal incontinence or constipation scores.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a high rate of cessation with RCE in patients with spina bifida. This could not be explained by associated conditions, or by enema-related parameters. One possible explanation is the lack of ongoing outpatient support for the children and their families.
© 2016 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peristeen; faecal incontinence; retrograde continence enema; spina bifida

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27862592     DOI: 10.1111/jpc.13408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1034-4810            Impact factor:   1.954


  4 in total

1.  Short versus mid-long-term outcome of transanal irrigation in children with spina bifida and anorectal malformations.

Authors:  Emanuele Ausili; A Marte; G Brisighelli; P Midrio; G Mosiello; E La Pergola; L Lombardi; B D Iacobelli; E Caponcelli; M Meroni; E Leva; C Rendeli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Malone Antegrade Continence Enemas vs. Cecostomy vs. Transanal Irrigation-What Is New and How Do We Counsel Our Patients?

Authors:  Maryellen S Kelly
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Peristeen Transanal Irrigation System to Manage Bowel Dysfunction: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

Authors:  Megan Dale; Helen Morgan; Kimberly Carter; Judith White; Grace Carolan-Rees
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.561

4.  Analysis of Factors Associated with Patient or Caregiver Regret following Surgery for Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Bhalaajee Meenakshi-Sundaram; Caitlin T Coco; James R Furr; Byron P Dubow; Christopher E Aston; Jennifer Lewis; Gennady Slobodov; Bradley P Kropp; Dominic C Frimberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 7.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.