Literature DB >> 27862265

Mode of Delivery and Long-Term Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes: A Prospective Population-Based Study.

Stavros Petrou1, Sung Wook Kim1, Penny McParland2, Elaine M Boyle3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known about the effects of mode of delivery on long-term health-related quality-of-life outcomes. Furthermore, no previous study has expressed these outcomes in preference-based (utility) metrics.
METHODS: The study population comprised 2,161 mothers recruited from a prospective population-based study in the East Midlands of England encompassing live births and stillbirths between 32+0 and 36+6 weeks' gestation and a sample of term-born controls. Perinatal data were extracted from the mothers' maternity records. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes were assessed at 12 months postpartum, using the EuroQol Five Dimensions (EQ-5D) measure with responses to the EQ-5D descriptive system converted into health utility scores. Descriptive statistics and multivariable analyses were used to estimate the relationship between the mode of delivery and health-related quality-of-life outcomes.
RESULTS: The overall health-related quality-of-life profile of the women in the study cohort mirrored that of the English adult population as revealed by national health surveys. A significantly higher proportion of women delivering by cesarean delivery reported some, moderate, severe, or extreme pain or discomfort at 12 months postpartum than women undergoing spontaneous vaginal delivery. Multivariable analyses, using the Ordinary Least Squares estimator revealed that, after controlling for maternal sociodemographic characteristics, cesarean delivery without maternal or fetal compromise was associated with a significant EQ-5D utility decrement in comparison to spontaneous vaginal delivery among all women (-0.026; p = 0.038) and among mothers of term-born infants (-0.062; p < 0.001). Among mothers of term-born infants, this result was replicated in models that controlled for all maternal and infant characteristics (utility decrement of -0.061; p < 0.001). The results were confirmed by sensitivity analyses that varied the categorization of the main exposure variable (mode of delivery) and the econometric strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: Among mothers of term-born infants, cesarean delivery without maternal or fetal compromise is associated with poorer long-term health-related quality of life in comparison to spontaneous vaginal delivery. Further longitudinal studies are needed to understand the magnitude, trajectory, and underpinning mechanisms of health-related quality-of-life outcomes following different modes of delivery.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EQ-5D; mode of delivery; quality of life; utilities

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27862265     DOI: 10.1111/birt.12268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  14 in total

1.  Impact of mode of delivery of twins on the pelvic floor 3 and 12 months post-partum-part II.

Authors:  Fanny Béchard; Christel Castelli; Sandrine Alonso; Emmanuelle Vintejoux; François Goffinet; Vincent Letouzey; Thomas Schmitz; Renaud de Tayrac
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Measuring perinatal and postpartum quality of life of women and associated factors in semi-urban Bangladesh.

Authors:  Rashidul Alam Mahumud; Nausad Ali; Nurnabi Sheikh; Raisul Akram; Khorshed Alam; Jeff Gow; Abdur Razzaque Sarker; Marufa Sultana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Psychometric properties of the Persian translation of maternal postpartum quality of life questionnaire (MAPP-QOL).

Authors:  Tahereh Mokhtaryan-Gilani; Giti Ozgoli; Nourossadat Kariman; Hamid Sharif Nia; Mahbobeh Ahmadi Doulabi; Malihe Nasiri
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  David Wastlund; Alexandros A Moraitis; Alison Dacey; Ulla Sovio; Edward C F Wilson; Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Determinants of Maternal Health-Related Quality of Life after Childbirth: The Generation R Study.

Authors:  Guannan Bai; Ida J Korfage; Eva Mautner; Hein Raat
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The cost-effectiveness of universal late-pregnancy screening for macrosomia in nulliparous women: a decision analysis.

Authors:  D Wastlund; A A Moraitis; J G Thornton; J Sanders; I R White; P Brocklehurst; Gcs Smith; Ecf Wilson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Implementation of the Living Well During Pregnancy Telecoaching Program for Women at High Risk of Excessive Gestational Weight Gain: Protocol for an Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Study.

Authors:  Susan de Jersey; Nina Meloncelli; Taylor Guthrie; Hilary Powlesland; Leonie Callaway; Angela T Chang; Shelley Wilkinson; Tracy Comans; Elizabeth Eakin
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-03-18

8.  Postpartum quality of life in Indian women after vaginal birth and cesarean section: a pilot study using the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system.

Authors:  Stefan Kohler; Kristi Sidney Annerstedt; Vishal Diwan; Lars Lindholm; Bharat Randive; Kranti Vora; Ayesha De Costa
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Psychosocial factors that mediate the association between mode of birth and maternal postnatal adjustment: findings from a population-based survey.

Authors:  Fiona Alderdice; Jane Henderson; Charles Opondo; Marci Lobel; Maria Quigley; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pervez Sultan; Nadir Sharawi; Lindsay Blake; Kazuo Ando; Ellile Sultan; Nima Aghaeepour; Brendan Carvalho; Nishant Sadana
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.