Literature DB >> 27861990

Contact sensitization in Dutch children and adolescents with and without atopic dermatitis - a retrospective analysis.

Stefanie Lubbes1, Thomas Rustemeyer2, Johannes H Sillevis Smitt1, Marie Louise Schuttelaar3, Maritza A Middelkamp-Hup1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis is known to occur in children with and without atopic dermatitis, but more data are needed on contact sensitization profiles in these two groups.
OBJECTIVES: To identify frequent allergens in children with and without atopic dermatitis suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of children aged 0-17 years patch tested between 1996 and 2013 was performed.
RESULTS: Of all 1012 children tested because of suspected contact dermatitis, 46% developed one or more positive reactions, the proportions for children with (n = 526) and without (n = 395) atopic dermatitis being 48% and 47%, respectively. Children with atopic dermatitis reacted more often to lanolin alcohol (30% pet., p = 0.030), Amerchol L-101 (p = 0.030), and fragrances [fragrance mix I (p = 0.048) and Myroxylon pereirae (p = 0.005)]. Allergens outside the European baseline series that frequently gave positive reactions in these groups included cocamidopropyl betaine and Amerchol L-101. Reactivity to these allergens was significantly more common in atopic dermatitis children.
CONCLUSION: Sensitization prevalences in children with and without atopic dermatitis were similar, but children with atopic dermatitis reacted significantly more often to lanolin alcohol and fragrances. Testing with additional series besides the European baseline series may be necessary, as reactions to, for example, cocamidopropyl betaine and Amerchol L-101 may otherwise be missed.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allergic contact dermatitis; atopic dermatitis; children; contact allergy; contact dermatitis; delayed-type hypersensitivity; patch testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27861990     DOI: 10.1111/cod.12711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Role and Diagnosis of Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Joshua L Owen; Paras P Vakharia; Jonathan I Silverberg
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.403

2.  Both children and adult patients with difficult-to-treat atopic dermatitis have high prevalences of concomitant allergic contact dermatitis and are frequently polysensitized.

Authors:  M Boonstra; T Rustemeyer; M A Middelkamp-Hup
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 3.  Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Wolfgang Uter; Thomas Werfel; Ian R White; Jeanne D Johansen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101.

Authors:  Jannet Knijp; Derk P Bruynzeel; Thomas Rustemeyer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  New positive patch test reactions on day 7-The additional value of the day 7 patch test reading.

Authors:  Cynthia C A van Amerongen; Robert Ofenloch; Daan Dittmar; Marie L A Schuttelaar
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 6.  What We Have Learned-Milestones in Pediatric Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dupuy; Melanie Miller; Nicole Harter
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2022-03-26

7.  Contact allergy in children with and without atopic dermatitis: An Italian multicentre study.

Authors:  Domenico Bonamonte; Katharina Hansel; Paolo Romita; Anna Belloni Fortina; Giampiero Girolomoni; Gabriella Fabbrocini; Cataldo Patruno; Maddalena Napolitano; Annalisa Patrizi; Giuseppe Argenziano; Giuseppe Micali; Piergiacomo Calzavara Pinton; Caterina Foti; Luca Stingeni
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.419

8.  Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to lanolin: A ROAT study.

Authors:  Ada Uldahl; Malin Engfeldt; Cecilia Svedman
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 6.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.