Literature DB >> 27861833

Organizational Factors Affect Safety-Net Hospitals' Breast Cancer Treatment Rates.

Nina A Bickell1, Alexandra DeNardis Moss2, Maria Castaldi3, Ajay Shah4, Alan Sickles5, Peter Pappas6, Theophilus Lewis7, Margaret Kemeny8, Shalini Arora9, Lori Schleicher10, Kezhen Fei1, Rebeca Franco1, Ann Scheck McAlearney2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify key organizational approaches associated with underuse of breast cancer care.
SETTING: Nine New York City area safety-net hospitals. STUDY
DESIGN: Mixed qualitative-quantitative, cross-sectional cohort.
METHODS: We used qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of key stakeholder interviews, defined organizational "conditions," calibrated conditions, and identified solution pathways. We defined underuse as no radiation after lumpectomy in women <75 years or mastectomy in women with ≥4 positive nodes, or no systemic therapy in women with tumors ≥1 cm. We used hierarchical models to assess organizational and patient factors' impact on underuse. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Underuse varied by hospital (8-29 percent). QCA found lower underuse sites designated individuals to track and follow-up no-shows; shared clinical information during handoffs; had fully integrated electronic medical records enabling transfer of responsibility across specialties; had strong system support; allocated resources to cancer clinics; had a patient-centered culture paying close organizational attention to clinic patients. High underuse sites lacked these characteristics. Multivariate modeling found that hospitals with strong approaches to follow-up had low underuse rates (RR = 0.28; 0.08-0.95); individual patient characteristics were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: At safety-net hospitals, underuse of needed cancer therapies is associated with organizational approaches to track and follow-up treatment. Findings provide varying approaches to safety nets to improve cancer care delivery. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer care quality; breast cancer; coordination; organizational approaches; qualitative comparative analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27861833      PMCID: PMC5682131          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  39 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic disparities within and between hospitals for inpatient quality of care: an examination of patient-level Hospital Quality Alliance measures.

Authors:  Romana Hasnain-Wynia; Raymond Kang; Mary Beth Landrum; Christine Vogeli; David W Baker; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-05

2.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Chuntao Wu; Xiaonan Xue; Jean Paul Hafner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Quality of care and health professional burnout: narrative literature review.

Authors:  Niamh Humphries; Karen Morgan; Mary Catherine Conry; Yvonne McGowan; Anthony Montgomery; Hannah McGee
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2014

Review 4.  The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality.

Authors:  Mary L Fennell; Irene Prabhu Das; Steven Clauser; Nicholas Petrelli; Andrew Salner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

5.  Low-quality, high-cost hospitals, mainly in South, care for sharply higher shares of elderly black, Hispanic, and medicaid patients.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Patient navigation for breast and colorectal cancer treatment: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Elizabeth Whitley; Samantha Hendren; Peter Raich; Sharon Humiston; Paul Winters; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Patricia Valverde; William Thorland; Ronald Epstein
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Racial differences in definitive breast cancer therapy in older women: are they explained by the hospitals where patients undergo surgery?

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Elena Kouri; Yulei He; Jane C Weeks; Eric P Winer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Missed opportunities: racial disparities in adjuvant breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jason J Wang; Soji Oluwole; Deborah Schrag; Henry Godfrey; Karen Hiotis; Jane Mendez; Amber A Guth
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Black patients more likely than whites to undergo surgery at low-quality hospitals in segregated regions.

Authors:  Justin Dimick; Joel Ruhter; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials.

Authors:  R Peto; C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; H C Pan; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; C Taylor; Y C Wang; J Bergh; A Di Leo; K Albain; S Swain; M Piccart; K Pritchard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing priority inpatient initiatives in the safety net setting.

Authors:  Erika L Crable; Dea Biancarelli; Allan J Walkey; Mari-Lynn Drainoni
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2020-03-11

2.  Implementation science for ambulatory care safety: a novel method to develop context-sensitive interventions to reduce quality gaps in monitoring high-risk patients.

Authors:  Kathryn M McDonald; George Su; Sarah Lisker; Emily S Patterson; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Disparate access to breast cancer screening and treatment.

Authors:  Maria Castaldi; Abbas Smiley; Katharine Kechejian; Jonathan Butler; Rifat Latifi
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Characteristics of healthcare organisations struggling to improve quality: results from a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Valerie M Vaughn; Sanjay Saint; Sarah L Krein; Jane H Forman; Jennifer Meddings; Jessica Ameling; Suzanne Winter; Whitney Townsend; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 7.035

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.