| Literature DB >> 27861635 |
Eun Jeong Won1, Soo Hyun Kim1, Seung Jung Kee1, Jong Hee Shin1, Soon Pal Suh1, Jong Yil Chai2, Dong Wook Ryang1, Myung Geun Shin1,3,4.
Abstract
Intestinal parasitic diseases occur worldwide and can cause diarrhea or gastroenteritis; however, their diagnosis is quite difficult, especially in low-endemism countries. We developed a multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of eight intestinal parasites and prospectively evaluated it for patients with gastroenteritis. The assay targeted Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica, Blastocystis hominis, Dientamoeba fragilis, Clonorchis sinensis, Metagonimus yokogawai, and Gymnophalloides seoi. Performance characteristics were evaluated based on recovery after DNA extraction, analytical sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, cross-reactivity, and interference characteristics. Clinical performance was validated against microscopy on 123 diarrheal samples. The assay demonstrated strong correlations between DNA concentrations and Ct values (R2, 0.9924-0.9998), and had a high PCR efficiency (83.3%-109.5%). Polymerase chain reactions detected as few as 10-30 copies of genomic DNA, and coefficient of variance was 0-7%. There was no cross-reactivity to the other 54 microorganisms tested. Interference occurred only in presence of high concentrations of erythrocytes or leukocytes. This assay had a higher correct identification rate (100.0% vs. 90.2%) and lower incorrect ID rate (0.0% vs. 9.8%) when compared to microscopy. Overall, this assay showed a higher sensitivity (100.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] of 80.5-100.0) than microscopy (29.4%; 95% CI 10.31-55.96), and the specificity levels were comparable for both methods (100.0%; 95% CI 96.58-100.0). This newly developed multiplex real-time PCR assay offers a potential use for detecting intestinal parasitic pathogens customized to the Korean population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27861635 PMCID: PMC5115832 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166957
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Established combination of primers and probes using the multiplex real-time PCR assay for the major parasites causing gastroenteritis.
| Target organism | Forward primer sequence (5'-3') | Reverse primer sequence (5'-3') | Optimized probe sequence (5'-3') | Target | Accession number of target sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAM- | CO1 | AF096234.3 | |||
| VIC- | 18s rRNA | EU482085.1 | |||
| Quasar670- | Cowp 1 | AB089292.1 | |||
| FAM- | beta-giardin | XM_001705373.1 | |||
| VIC- | 18s rRNA | X65163.1 | |||
| Quasar670- | CO1 | AB470519.1 | |||
| FAM- | CO1 | FJ381664.2 | |||
| VIC- | 18s rRNA | JQ677163.1 |
CO1 = cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1; Cowp = Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein
PCR efficiency (%) obtained from slope of dependence of DNA concentrations on threshold cycle (Ct) values.
| Target organism | Average Ct values as a function of DNA concentrations | R2 | Slope | Efficiency (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 fg | 10 fg | 1 fg | 100 ag | 10 ag | ||||
| 26.0 | 29.5 | 33.1 | 37.3 | 41.1 | 0.999 | -3.8 | 83.3 | |
| 27.4 | 30.8 | 34.4 | 37.3 | 41.1 | 0.998 | -3.39 | 97.1 | |
| 26.5 | 30.0 | 33.4 | 36.7 | 39.9 | 1 | -3.34 | 99.1 | |
| 27.9 | 31.5 | 35.2 | 38.2 | 41.7 | 0.999 | -3.43 | 95.6 | |
| 30.3 | 33.7 | 37.2 | 40.9 | 43.0 | 0.992 | -3.25 | 103.2 | |
| 25.7 | 29.3 | 32.8 | 36.1 | 39.5 | 1 | -3.43 | 95.6 | |
| 25.8 | 29.4 | 32.7 | 36.4 | 39.6 | 0.999 | -3.47 | 94.3 | |
| 30.9 | 34.1 | 37.6 | 40.8 | 43.2 | 0.996 | -3.12 | 109.5 | |
Analytical sensitivity (limit of detection, LoD) and analytical precision of the multiplex qPCR assay.
| Average Ct values depending on the copy number of target DNA | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target organism | Performances | 30,000 copies | 3,000 copies | 300 copies | 30 copies | 10 copies | 5 copies | N.C. |
| Average Ct value | 26.05 | 29.2 | 32.9 | 36.26 | 39.31 | 39.41 | - | |
| SD | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 2.22 | 1.58 | - | |
| CV | 0.41% | 0.74% | 1.37% | 1.17% | 5.65% | 4.00% | - | |
| Detection rate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 38% | - | |
| Average Ct value | 27.46 | 30.77 | 34.15 | 37.24 | 40.98 | 39.26 | - | |
| SD | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.46 | 0.75 | 2.23 | 0.97 | - | |
| CV | 0.83% | 0.86% | 1.34% | 2.01% | 5.45% | 2.47% | - | |
| Detection rate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 33% | 0% | |
| Average Ct value | 26.52 | 30.02 | 33.36 | 36.94 | 39.28 | 39.01 | - | |
| SD | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.39 | 1.69 | 1.72 | 1.77 | - | |
| CV | 0.64% | 0.74% | 1.16% | 4.58% | 4.37% | 4.55% | - | |
| Detection rate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 54% | 25% | 0% | |
| Average Ct value | 27.73 | 31.15 | 34.7 | 37.53 | 40.72 | 41.44 | - | |
| SD | 0.39 | 0.32 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 2.11 | 1.95 | - | |
| CV | 1.40% | 1.04% | 1.86% | 1.96% | 5.19% | 4.71% | - | |
| Detection rate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 63% | 71% | 0% | |
| Average Ct value | 30.47 | 34.08 | 37.29 | 40.63 | 42.25 | 40.77 | - | |
| SD | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.82 | 1.55 | 1.4 | - | |
| CV | 1.35% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 2.01% | 3.68% | 3.43% | - | |
| Detection rate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 46% | 17% | 0% | |
| Average Ct value | 25.73 | 29.28 | 32.23 | 36.23 | 39.47 | 39.2 | - | |
| SD | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 1.07 | 2.68 | 1.84 | - | |
| CV | 0.48% | 0.97% | 1.09% | 2.96% | 6.78% | 4.70% | - | |
| Detection rate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 79% | 50% | 0% | |
| Average Ct value | 25.88 | 29.39 | 32.24 | 35.65 | 38.38 | 39.51 | - | |
| SD | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.65 | 1.77 | 1.31 | 2.11 | - | |
| CV | 0.35% | 0.57% | 2.02% | 4.96% | 3.42% | 5.34% | - | |
| Detection rate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 58% | 0% | |
| Average Ct value | 30.15 | 33.94 | 37.2 | 40.14 | 41.64 | 40.21 | - | |
| SD | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.76 | 1.56 | 1.66 | - | |
| CV | 1.51% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.89% | 3.74% | 4.12% | - | |
| Detection rate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 54% | 13% | 0% | |
Ct = threshold cycle; CV = coefficient of variation; N.C. = negative control; SD = standard deviation.
Comparison of microscopic examination and multiplex qPCR in terms of detection of the major parasites causing gastroenteritis, in stool samples from patients with diarrhea.
| Final identification | No. of specimens | Microscopy | Multiple qPCR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correct ID | Incorrect ID | Correct ID | Incorrect ID | ||
| 8 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| 106 | 106 | 0 | 106 | 0 | |
| 123 | 111 (90.2) | 12 (9.8) | 123 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
a The six positive controls include 2 of Entamoeba histolytica, 2 of Giardia lamblia, and 2 of Gymnophalloides seoi.
Abbreviations: ID, identification.
Fig 1Representative reaction curves of the multiplex real-time PCR assay.
A) Multiple reaction curves indicate amplification of the positive controls and clinical samples obtained from patients with gastroenteritis. B) Positive curves of two positive controls for Cryptosporidium parvum (tube 1) and Metagonimus yokogawai (tube 2) were observed in the Quasar 670 channel. Patient No. 106’s sample showed a positive curve within tube 1 according to Quasar 670 signals. C) Positive curves of two positive controls for Blastocystis hominis (tube 1), Entamoeba histolytica (tube 2), and Dientamoeba fragilis (tube 3) were observed in the VIC/HEX channel. Patient No. 112’s sample showed a positive curve within tube 1 according to the VIC/HEX signals. D) Positive curves of two positive controls for Gymnophalloides seoi (tube 1), Giardia lamblia (tube 2), and Clonorchis sinensis (tube 3) were observed in the FAM channel. Patient No. 35’s sample showed a positive curve within tube 3 according to FAM signals.
Diagnostic performance from microscopic examination and multiplex qPCR in terms of detection of the major parasites causing gastroenteritis in stool samples from patients with diarrhea.
| Methods | Results | No. of specimens with | Diagnostic performance [95% confidence interval] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive for the parasites | Negative for the parasites | Subtotal | SEN | SPE | PPV | NPV | ||
| Microscopy | Positive | 5 | 0 | 5 | ||||
| Negative | 12 | 106 | 118 | |||||
| Subtotal | 17 | 106 | 123 | 29.40% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 89.80% | |
| [10.31–55.96] | [96.58–100.0] | [47.82–100.0] | [82.91–94.63] | |||||
| Multiplex qPCR | Positive | 17 | 0 | 17 | ||||
| Negative | 0 | 106 | 106 | |||||
| Subtotal | 17 | 106 | 123 | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| [80.5–100.0] | [96.58–100.0] | [81.49–100.0] | [96.58–100.0] | |||||
Abbreviations: NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity