BACKGROUND:Aerobic exercise reduces blood pressure (BP) on average 5-7 mmHg among those with hypertension; limited evidence suggests similar or even greater BP benefits may result from isometric handgrip (IHG) resistance exercise. METHOD: We conducted a randomized controlled trial investigating the antihypertensive effects of an acute bout of aerobic compared with IHG exercise in the same individuals. Middle-aged adults (n = 27) with prehypertension and obesity randomly completed three experiments: aerobic (60% peak oxygen uptake, 30 min); IHG (30% maximum voluntary contraction, 4 × 2 min bilateral); and nonexercise control. Study participants were assessed for carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity pre and post exercise, and left the laboratory wearing an ambulatory BP monitor. RESULTS:SBP and DBP were lower after aerobic versus IHG (4.8 ± 1.8/3.1 ± 1.3 mmHg, P = 0.01/0.04) and control (5.6 ± 1.8/3.6 ± 1.3 mmHg, P = 0.02/0.04) over the awake hours, with no difference between IHG versus control (P = 0.80/0.83). Pulse wave velocity changes following acute exercise did not differ by modality (aerobic increased 0.01 ± 0.21 ms, IHG decreased 0.06 ± 0.15 ms, control increased 0.25 ± 0.17 ms, P > 0.05). A subset of participants then completed either 8 weeks of aerobic or IHG training. Awake SBP was lower after versus before aerobic training (7.6 ± 3.1 mmHg, P = 0.02), whereas sleep DBP was higher after IHG training (7.7 ± 2.3 mmHg, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Our findings did not support IHG as antihypertensive therapy but that aerobic exercise should continue to be recommended as the primary exercise modality for its immediate and sustained BP benefits.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Aerobic exercise reduces blood pressure (BP) on average 5-7 mmHg among those with hypertension; limited evidence suggests similar or even greater BP benefits may result from isometric handgrip (IHG) resistance exercise. METHOD: We conducted a randomized controlled trial investigating the antihypertensive effects of an acute bout of aerobic compared with IHG exercise in the same individuals. Middle-aged adults (n = 27) with prehypertension and obesity randomly completed three experiments: aerobic (60% peak oxygen uptake, 30 min); IHG (30% maximum voluntary contraction, 4 × 2 min bilateral); and nonexercise control. Study participants were assessed for carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity pre and post exercise, and left the laboratory wearing an ambulatory BP monitor. RESULTS:SBP and DBP were lower after aerobic versus IHG (4.8 ± 1.8/3.1 ± 1.3 mmHg, P = 0.01/0.04) and control (5.6 ± 1.8/3.6 ± 1.3 mmHg, P = 0.02/0.04) over the awake hours, with no difference between IHG versus control (P = 0.80/0.83). Pulse wave velocity changes following acute exercise did not differ by modality (aerobic increased 0.01 ± 0.21 ms, IHG decreased 0.06 ± 0.15 ms, control increased 0.25 ± 0.17 ms, P > 0.05). A subset of participants then completed either 8 weeks of aerobic or IHG training. Awake SBP was lower after versus before aerobic training (7.6 ± 3.1 mmHg, P = 0.02), whereas sleep DBP was higher after IHG training (7.7 ± 2.3 mmHg, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Our findings did not support IHG as antihypertensive therapy but that aerobic exercise should continue to be recommended as the primary exercise modality for its immediate and sustained BP benefits.
Authors: Linda S Pescatello; Hayley V MacDonald; Garrett I Ash; Lauren M Lamberti; William B Farquhar; Ross Arena; Blair T Johnson Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Mark B Badrov; Cassandra L Bartol; Matthew A DiBartolomeo; Philip J Millar; Nancy H McNevin; Cheri L McGowan Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Linda S Pescatello; Lynn Bairos; Jaci L Vanheest; C M Maresh; N R Rodriguez; Niall M Moyna; Christopher DiPasquale; Valerie Collins; Cherie L Meckes; Lori Krueger; Paul D Thompson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: James P Sheppard; Ben Fletcher; Paramjit Gill; Una Martin; Nia Roberts; Richard J McManus Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Garrett I Ash; Timothy J Walker; Kayla M Olson; Jeffrey H Stratton; Ana L Gómez; William J Kraemer; Jeff S Volek; Linda S Pescatello Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: Matthew C Babcock; Austin T Robinson; Joseph C Watso; Kamila U Migdal; Christopher R Martens; David G Edwards; Linda S Pescatello; William B Farquhar Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2020-04
Authors: Anderson Caetano Paulo; Claudia L M Forjaz; Décio Mion; Giovanio V Silva; Silvana Barros; Valmor Tricoli Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 4.566