Carlisdania Mendoza1, Clare Barrington, Yeycy Donastorg, Martha Perez, Paul J Fleming, Michele R Decker, Deanna Kerrigan. 1. *Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; †Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; ‡Instituto Dermatologico y Cirugia de la Piel; §University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI; and ‖Department of Health, Behavior and Society, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Female sex workers (FSWs) experience high rates of violence from their sexual partners. Although violence is associated with HIV risk behaviors among FSWs, there is limited evidence on the association between violence and HIV treatment outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed data from a socio-behavioral survey with a cohort of FSWs living with HIV in the Dominican Republic (n = 268) to describe the burden of violence from a sexual partner in the last 6 months. We assessed the relationship between violence and HIV treatment outcomes, comparing findings across 2 types of sexual partners: intimate partners and clients. RESULTS: Nearly one-fifth of women (18.3%) experienced violence in the last 6 months. More women experienced violence from an intimate partner (12.3%) than a client (8.3%), with some (2.6%) reporting both. Although violence from an intimate partner was significantly associated with not currently being on antiretroviral treatment [ART; adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 4.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00 to 16.36] and missing an ART dose in the last 4 days (AOR: 5.26, 95% CI: 1.91 to 14.53), violence from a client was associated with never having received HIV care (AOR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.03 to 7.92) and ever interrupting ART (AOR: 5.45, 95% CI: 1.50 to 19.75). CONCLUSIONS: Violence from a sexual partner is associated with poor HIV treatment outcomes among FSWs. Different patterns by type of partner reflect how relationship dynamics may influence these associations. Violence prevention and support services should be tailored based on type of partner. Violence screening and referrals should be integrated into HIV care services for FSWs to improve their health and reduce ongoing transmission.
BACKGROUND: Female sex workers (FSWs) experience high rates of violence from their sexual partners. Although violence is associated with HIV risk behaviors among FSWs, there is limited evidence on the association between violence and HIV treatment outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed data from a socio-behavioral survey with a cohort of FSWs living with HIV in the Dominican Republic (n = 268) to describe the burden of violence from a sexual partner in the last 6 months. We assessed the relationship between violence and HIV treatment outcomes, comparing findings across 2 types of sexual partners: intimate partners and clients. RESULTS: Nearly one-fifth of women (18.3%) experienced violence in the last 6 months. More women experienced violence from an intimate partner (12.3%) than a client (8.3%), with some (2.6%) reporting both. Although violence from an intimate partner was significantly associated with not currently being on antiretroviral treatment [ART; adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 4.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00 to 16.36] and missing an ART dose in the last 4 days (AOR: 5.26, 95% CI: 1.91 to 14.53), violence from a client was associated with never having received HIV care (AOR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.03 to 7.92) and ever interrupting ART (AOR: 5.45, 95% CI: 1.50 to 19.75). CONCLUSIONS: Violence from a sexual partner is associated with poor HIV treatment outcomes among FSWs. Different patterns by type of partner reflect how relationship dynamics may influence these associations. Violence prevention and support services should be tailored based on type of partner. Violence screening and referrals should be integrated into HIV care services for FSWs to improve their health and reduce ongoing transmission.
Authors: Kate Shannon; Anna-Louise Crago; Stefan D Baral; Linda-Gail Bekker; Deanna Kerrigan; Michele R Decker; Tonia Poteat; Andrea L Wirtz; Brian Weir; Marie-Claude Boily; Jenny Butler; Steffanie A Strathdee; Chris Beyrer Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jennifer L Glick; Rienna G Russo; Aimee Kao-Hsuan Huang; Belinda Jivapong; Vijayasundaram Ramasamy; Lori M Rosman; Danielle L Pelaez; Susan G Sherman Journal: Glob Public Health Date: 2020-12-10
Authors: Emily Evens; Michele Lanham; Karin Santi; Juana Cooke; Kathleen Ridgeway; Giuliana Morales; Caleb Parker; Claire Brennan; Marjan de Bruin; Pavel Chladni Desrosiers; Xenia Diaz; Marta Drago; Roger McLean; Modesto Mendizabal; Dirk Davis; Rebecca B Hershow; Robyn Dayton Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights Date: 2019-03-05
Authors: Catherine E Oldenburg; Katrina F Ortblad; Michael M Chanda; Magdalene Mwale; Steven Chongo; Catherine Kanchele; Nyambe Kamungoma; Andrew Fullem; Till Bärnighausen Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 3.731