Literature DB >> 27860505

Evolution of Inbreeding Avoidance and Inbreeding Preference through Mate Choice among Interacting Relatives.

A Bradley Duthie, Jane M Reid.   

Abstract

While extensive population genetic theory predicts conditions favoring evolution of self-fertilization versus outcrossing, there is no analogous theory that predicts conditions favoring evolution of inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding preference enacted through mate choice given obligate biparental reproduction. Multiple interacting processes complicate the dynamics of alleles underlying such inbreeding strategies, including sexual conflict, distributions of kinship, genetic drift, purging of mutation load, direct costs, and restricted kin discrimination. We incorporated these processes into an individual-based model to predict conditions where selection should increase or decrease frequencies of alleles causing inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding preference when females or males controlled mating. Selection for inbreeding avoidance occurred given strong inbreeding depression when either sex chose mates, while selection for inbreeding preference occurred given very weak inbreeding depression when females chose but never occurred when males chose. Selection for both strategies was constrained by direct costs and restricted kin discrimination. Purging was negligible, but allele frequencies were strongly affected by drift in small populations, while selection for inbreeding avoidance was weak in larger populations because inbreeding risk decreased. Therefore, while selection sometimes favored alleles underlying inbreeding avoidance or preference, evolution of such strategies may be much more restricted and stochastic than is commonly presumed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fitness; inbreeding strategy; mate choice; mating system; relatedness; reproductive strategy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27860505     DOI: 10.1086/688919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  11 in total

Review 1.  Give one species the task to come up with a theory that spans them all: what good can come out of that?

Authors:  Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Cost, risk, and avoidance of inbreeding in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Amy E Leedale; Michelle Simeoni; Stuart P Sharp; Jonathan P Green; Jon Slate; Robert F Lachlan; Elva J H Robinson; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Meta-analytic evidence that animals rarely avoid inbreeding.

Authors:  Raïssa A de Boer; Regina Vega-Trejo; Alexander Kotrschal; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Estimating selection on the act of inbreeding in a population with strong inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Eva Troianou; Jisca Huisman; Josephine M Pemberton; Craig A Walling
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  How relatedness between mates influences reproductive success: An experimental analysis of self-fertilization and biparental inbreeding in a marine bryozoan.

Authors:  Scott C Burgess; Lisa Sander; Marília Bueno
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Feed-backs among inbreeding, inbreeding depression in sperm traits, and sperm competition can drive evolution of costly polyandry.

Authors:  Greta Bocedi; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Evolution of precopulatory and post-copulatory strategies of inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry.

Authors:  A B Duthie; G Bocedi; R R Germain; J M Reid
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 8.  Sex-biased dispersal: a review of the theory.

Authors:  Xiang-Yi Li; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2018-10-24

9.  Inbreeding shapes the evolution of marine invertebrates.

Authors:  Kevin C Olsen; Will H Ryan; Alice A Winn; Ellen T Kosman; Jose A Moscoso; Stacy A Krueger-Hadfield; Scott C Burgess; David B Carlon; Richard K Grosberg; Susan Kalisz; Don R Levitan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Gabriela K Hajduk; Andrew Cockburn; Nicolas Margraf; Helen L Osmond; Craig A Walling; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.