| Literature DB >> 27860183 |
Guo-Ping Zhang1, Jing Zhang2, Chao-Hua Zhu1, Lei Lin1, Jian Wang1, Hai-Jing Zhang1, Jun Li1, Xiao-Guang Yu1, Zhen-Shuan Zhao1, Wei Dong1, Guo-Bin Liu1.
Abstract
To study the effects of microRNA-98 (miR-98) on human bone mesenchymal stromal cells (hBMSCs). The patients undergoing hip arthroplasty were selected by inclusion/exclusion criteria for this study. The extracted hBMSCs were detected of osteogenic differentiation by alizarin red S staining, and of cell phenotype by flow cytometry. Bioinformatics, dual luciferase report, western blotting, RT-PCR and immunoblotting were used in our study. The hBMSCs were divided into miR-98 mimics, miR-98 negative control (NC), miR-98 inhibitors, Mock and miR-98 inhibitors + siBMP2 groups. Human bone mesenchymal stromal cells were extracted and purified in vitro and had specific cytological morphology, surface markers and abilities of self-renewal and differentiation. Compared with the NC group and Mock group, the miR-98 mimics group showed increased miR-98 level while the miR-98 inhibitors group decreased miR-98 level (both P < 0.01). Dual luciferase reporter showed BMP2 was the target gene of miR-98. The levels of mRNA and protein expression of BMP2, protein expression of RUNX2, alkaline phosphatase activity and osteocalcin content significantly decreased in the miR-98 mimics group while increased in the miR-98 inhibitors group and showed no changes in the NC group and Mock group (all P < 0.05). The miR-98 mimics group showed obviously declined stained red particles and the miR-98 inhibitors group showed opposite result. After lowering the expression of miR-98, osteogenic differentiation ability of hBMSCs rose, which was weakened by the transfection with siBMP2. miR-98 may regulate osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs by targeting BMP2.Entities:
Keywords: bone morphogenetic protein-2; human bone mesenchymal stromal cells; microRNA; microRNA-98; osteogenic differentiation; signal pathway; transcription; translation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27860183 PMCID: PMC5264139 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Primer sequence
| Gene | Primer sequence |
|---|---|
| miR‐98 | F: 5′‐GGGACTGGACTTGGAGTCA‐3′ |
| R: 5′‐GTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCG‐3′ | |
| BMP2 | F: 5′‐AACCTGCAACAGCCAACT‐3′ |
| R: 5′‐GGAGCCACAATCCAGTCAT‐3′ | |
| GAPDH | F: 5′‐ACACCATGGGGAAGGTGAAG‐3′ |
| R: 5′‐AAGGGGTCATTGATGGCAAC‐3′ |
F: forward; R: reverse.
Figure 1Morphology of hBMSCs (light microscope, ×100). hBMSCs: human bone mesenchymal stromal cells.
Figure 2Osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. hBMSCs: human bone mesenchymal stromal cells. (A) Alizarin red S staining after 21 days of osteogenic induction of hBMSCs; (B) Alizarin red S staining after 21 days without osteogenic induction of hBMSCs. Light microscope, ×400.
Figure 3Surface markers detection of hBMSCs. hBMSCs: human bone mesenchymal stromal cells.
Figure 4Relative activity of luciferase commonly transfected with BMP2 3′UTR and miR‐98 mimics. (A) Base sequence pair graph between miR‐98 and BMP2 3′UTR; (B) relative activity of luciferase commonly transfected with BMP2 3′UTR and miR‐98 mimics compared with no transfection; ** represented the P‐value less than 0.01. NC: negative control.
Figure 5Expressions of miR‐98 and BMP2 in each group. (A) qPCR was performed to determine the expressions of miR‐98 and BMP2 in each group; (B) western blotting was performed to determine the protein expression of BMP2 in each group; ** and # represented the P‐value less than 0.01 compared with the Mock group and the NC group, respectively. NC: negative control.
Figure 6Calcium nodules in each group of cells after 21 days of osteogenic induction. NC: negative control. Light microscope, ×100.
Figure 7Levels of osteogenic markers in each group of cells. (A) The protein expression of RUNX2 in each group of cells; (B) ALP activity in each group of cells; (C) OC content in each group of cells; * represented the P‐value less than 0.05 compared with the Mock group and NC group; ** represented the P‐value less than 0.01 compared with the Mock group and NC group; # represented the P‐value less than 0.05 compared with the miR‐98 inhibitors group; & represented the P‐value less than 0.05 compared with the miR‐98 inhibitors + siBMP2 group. ALP: alkaline phosphatase; NC: negative control.