OBJECTIVE: To assess the spatial distribution of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) within the coronary arteries and describe procedural strategies and outcomes during CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Acute occlusions due to plaque rupture tend to cluster within the proximal third of the coronary artery. METHODS: We examined the clinical and procedural characteristics of 1,348 patients according to lesion location within the coronary tree. RESULTS: A total of 1,369 lesions in 1,348 patients (mean age 66 ± 10 years, 85% male) were included. CTO PCI of proximal segments (n = 633, 46%) was more common than of mid (n = 557, 41%) and distal segments (n = 179, 13%). Patients undergoing CTO PCI of proximal segments were more likely to be smokers (P < 0.01), have prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (P = 0.03) and lower ejection fraction (P = 0.04). CTOs occurring in proximal segments had longer length (P <0.01), proximal cap ambiguity (P < 0.01), and moderate/severe calcification (P < 0.01) compared to mid or distally located CTOs. Interventional collaterals were more often present in CTO PCI of proximal segments (64%, 53%, 56%, P < 0.01) consistent with the higher use of retrograde approach (47%, 33%, 37%, P < 0.01) relative to antegrade wire escalation (67%, 82%, 82%, P < 0.01). Procedural complexity was higher in CTO PCI of proximal segments (vs. mid and distal): contrast volume= 275 ml (200-375), 260 ml (200-350), 250 ml (175-350), P = 0.01; fluoroscopy time 53 minutes (32-83), 39 minutes (24-65), 40 minutes (22-72), P < 0.01. However, procedural success (87%, 90%, 85%, P = 0.1), technical success (89%, 91%, 88%, P = 0.24), and complications rates (2.8%, 2.5%, 2.2%, P = 0.88) were not different. CONCLUSIONS: The most common target vessel location for CTO PCI is the proximal coronary segment. PCI of proximal occlusions is associated with adverse clinical and angiographic characteristics and often requires use of the retrograde approach, but can be accomplished with high procedural and technical success and low complication rates.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the spatial distribution of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) within the coronary arteries and describe procedural strategies and outcomes during CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Acute occlusions due to plaque rupture tend to cluster within the proximal third of the coronary artery. METHODS: We examined the clinical and procedural characteristics of 1,348 patients according to lesion location within the coronary tree. RESULTS: A total of 1,369 lesions in 1,348 patients (mean age 66 ± 10 years, 85% male) were included. CTO PCI of proximal segments (n = 633, 46%) was more common than of mid (n = 557, 41%) and distal segments (n = 179, 13%). Patients undergoing CTO PCI of proximal segments were more likely to be smokers (P < 0.01), have prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (P = 0.03) and lower ejection fraction (P = 0.04). CTOs occurring in proximal segments had longer length (P <0.01), proximal cap ambiguity (P < 0.01), and moderate/severe calcification (P < 0.01) compared to mid or distally located CTOs. Interventional collaterals were more often present in CTO PCI of proximal segments (64%, 53%, 56%, P < 0.01) consistent with the higher use of retrograde approach (47%, 33%, 37%, P < 0.01) relative to antegrade wire escalation (67%, 82%, 82%, P < 0.01). Procedural complexity was higher in CTO PCI of proximal segments (vs. mid and distal): contrast volume= 275 ml (200-375), 260 ml (200-350), 250 ml (175-350), P = 0.01; fluoroscopy time 53 minutes (32-83), 39 minutes (24-65), 40 minutes (22-72), P < 0.01. However, procedural success (87%, 90%, 85%, P = 0.1), technical success (89%, 91%, 88%, P = 0.24), and complications rates (2.8%, 2.5%, 2.2%, P = 0.88) were not different. CONCLUSIONS: The most common target vessel location for CTO PCI is the proximal coronary segment. PCI of proximal occlusions is associated with adverse clinical and angiographic characteristics and often requires use of the retrograde approach, but can be accomplished with high procedural and technical success and low complication rates.
Authors: Khaldoon Alaswad; Rohan V Menon; Georgios Christopoulos; William L Lombardi; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; J Aaron Grantham; Steven P Marso; Michael R Wyman; Nagendra R Pokala; Siddharth M Patel; Anna P Kotsia; Bavana V Rangan; Nicholas Lembo; David Kandzari; James Lee; Anna Kalynych; Harold Carlson; Santiago A Garcia; Craig A Thompson; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil S Brilakis Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Georgios Christopoulos; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Khaldoon Alaswad; Robert W Yeh; Farouc A Jaffer; R Michael Wyman; William L Lombardi; Rohan V Menon; J Aaron Grantham; David E Kandzari; Nicholas Lembo; Jeffrey W Moses; Ajay J Kirtane; Manish Parikh; Philip Green; Matthew Finn; Santiago Garcia; Anthony Doing; Mitul Patel; John Bahadorani; Muhammad Nauman J Tarar; Georgios E Christakopoulos; Craig A Thompson; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil S Brilakis Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Judith S Hochman; David O Williams; William E Boden; T Bruce Ferguson; Robert A Harrington; David J Maron Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Patrick W Serruys; Yoshinobu Onuma; Scot Garg; Giovanna Sarno; Marcel van den Brand; Arie-Pieter Kappetein; Nic Van Dyck; Michael Mack; David Holmes; Ted Feldman; Marie-Claude Morice; Antonio Colombo; Eric Bass; Katrin Leadley; Keith D Dawkins; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Marie-Angèle M Morel; Friedrich W Mohr Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: R M Califf; H R Phillips; M C Hindman; D B Mark; K L Lee; V S Behar; R A Johnson; D B Pryor; R A Rosati; G S Wagner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1985-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Georgios Christopoulos; David E Kandzari; Robert W Yeh; Farouc A Jaffer; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Michael R Wyman; Khaldoon Alaswad; William Lombardi; J Aaron Grantham; Jeffrey Moses; Georgios Christakopoulos; Muhammad Nauman J Tarar; Bavana V Rangan; Nicholas Lembo; Santiago Garcia; Daisha Cipher; Craig A Thompson; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil S Brilakis Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690